Showing posts with label The Forgotten. Show all posts
Showing posts with label The Forgotten. Show all posts

Tuesday, September 22, 2009

Script Writing 101: The Crime Procedural

After suffering through the mediocrity that the CW had to offer, I was really hoping the real networks would have something better to offer. I watched ABC's latest outing, The Forgotten, and, well... How to put this gently... So far, so... bad...? Oh, so bad... Wow.

I knew going in that anything that had Jerry Bruckheimer's sticky fingers involved probably wouldn't be very good, but I tried to have an open mind. Even after the show was completely retooled and recast from its previous incarnation, I was willing to give it a shot... Then Christian Slater came on board... There's only so open a mind can be, people...

The Forgotten felt like I was watching a mad lib about crime procedurals. The writers filled in all the obvious blanks with run-of-the-mill answers and out came your standard crime drama filled with murder, and in this iteration, a fair amount of cheese and boredom. The pilot was uninspired, unoriginal, and eye-rollingly predictable from start to finish. Even in the areas where the writers were trying to reinvent the wheel, they seem to have created a spare tire.

The only real difference between The Forgotten and every other crime procedural you've seen a million times is that the writers filled in the "voiceover by" blank with "the victim." A group of civilian crime-solvers go through the motions of figuring out who Jane Doe is while her voice blathers on about life and death and whatnot in the dullest fashion possible. I have a sneaking suspicion that someone read The Lovely Bones and decided to appropriate the idea... only with much less successful results. It doesn't come across as raw and insightful as it does in the book, but rather pummels the viewer with gimmicky would-be insights that felt insincere and contrived. It didn't make me care more about the girl who died and didn't allow me a window into a foreign experience. Voiceovers rather often fall flat for me and this is no exception. In this instance, however, rather than offering plot exposition or the inner thoughts of one of the protagonists, its the musings of a character whom we'll never see again and who's already dead. Overall, the voiceover struck me as unnecessary and lame. The voice is talking to us the whole time, but unlike The Lovely Bones, the victim doesn't tell us anything about her death until the characters in the show have wrapped everything up in a nice, neat little bow. Then and only then does the voiceover go into the elaborate wrap-up and lays out what happened and why. Given that the audience has just spent the last 41 minutes watching people figure all this out, it's not only unnecessary, but fairly redundant. But the writers didn't stop there. Want another motif lifted from the book that didn't really work as well here? Yeah, the investigators see visions of the dead girl walking around in the various locales they search. Oy.

The team is lead by Christian Slater who's hot off his most recent failure, My Own Worst Enemy. I don't like labeling anyone a showkiller, but he certainly seems to pick some real winners. Within minutes, it became painfully obvious that he'd be filling the role of "guarded leader with a personal connection to his work." To absolutely no one's surprise, the writers filled in the "personal tragedy" blank with "disappearance of daughter." It's what drew him to this gig and is what makes him the best in the business and drives him to work harder and blah, blah, blah. As far as a protagonist is concerned, I've seen this one a million times before, only better. Slater brings nothing new or interesting to a role that the writers appear to have slapped together in 20 minutes. It's as though they were in a script writing class and had to finish a project just before class. They took the list of required elements and doled out as necessary to fulfill the quota. Soup to nuts, I'm bored.

Along with Slater, the forgotten network (groups of freelance civilians all across the nation who come together with the police to identify Jane and John Does, of course--what? You've never heard of this either? Well, just go with it! I have Biology class in 10 minutes!) includes your standard band of characters: the overly attractive woman who has also suffered personal tragedy (and who will become the obvious love interest for Slater) but hides her pain with a sad smile, the other overly attractive, but younger woman who is the positive, earnest, go-getter of the group, the overweight guy who will be providing comic relief, and lest you think the writers decided to break out of the box for the final character, we have "the new guy" filled in the blank for "vehicle for plot exposition."

As with oh-so-many pilots, crappy writers feel like they need to explain every single aspect of a world to the audience, because clearly we're too damn stupid to figure anything out for ourselves, draw any informed conclusions, or be comfortable with not knowing the minutia of a show for 10 minutes. The new guy/girl on a show assumes the role of the audience and is a means by which the writers can explain everything to us by having the other characters have to explain everything to him. It's lazy and easy and annoying to watch. Ugh. Great pilots don't need such a vehicle. Bad pilots require some sort of big ass SUV, and really bad pilots? I'm going to go with aircraft carrier... The vehicle for this pilot falls somewhere in between. I couldn't stop rolling my eyes and groaning it was so lame and embarrassingly convenient. Yeah, so not only does he play "new guy," but he also plays "rebel," and "special skills" guy as well. In order for the writers to not have to try very hard in the future, they very conveniently made "new guy" a--wait for it--med school drop out who happens to be a sculptor. Why, that's the exact skill set a group of investigators such as this would need! How fortuitous! It's a hallmark of lazy writing is what it really is, but who's splitting hairs.

To add insult to injury, the show is brimming with self-righteous aggrandizing that had me shaking my head. I couldn't unfurl my disdain brow for like a hour afterward. Team member Earnestness and Rainbows was forced to shoulder most of the platitudes and pablum. I was actually embarrassed for her as an actress and even for the character--whom I cared about not a bit. “What’s the first thing that happened when you’re brought into this world?” she asks Team member New Guy. “You get a name," is the obvious response. Well, apparently Earnest Sunshine is afraid no one is coming to her funeral because she offers the banal truism, “I’d want the world to remember that I was here, that I did things, that I affected people.” Well, kitten, I'm not sure that's the case... In her real life, she works in an office doing nothing of value, so I see where the writers were going with that, but it really fell flat for me. All I kept thinking of were those people who wish they could attend their own funerals to see just how loved they were. As though you can quantify the value of a life by how many people remember who you were. Ugh. In her defense, Slater himself gets the final tear-filled insight at the girl's funeral as the mother of the victim asks if the people who found her daughter are here. He poignantly (and predictably) responds, "They're everywhere." Oooh, that's deep! And cheesy! It's a Chicago style pizza is what it is... Heh, the show is set in Chicago... That just made my day. :)

Anyway, the rag-tag group of ordinary heroes crisscrosses the standard crime procedural landscape trying to figure out who "Highway Jane" is, working their way through three "red herring" blanks (two of which they lazily filled in with "ex-boyfriend") a "goose chase" blank they filled in with "false identity" and ambled their way to the end where, wouldn't you know it? It's the person we least expect! Huzahh! I'm SO getting an A on this assignment! Yeah, not so fast, writing staff... Turns out, the girl who ultimately turns out to be the killer is the girl who allowed the forgotten network to identify her in the first place. Okay, I know teenagers are stupid, but why exactly did she help them out in the first place? Who knows, but more importantly, who cares.

This pilot was pretty much a train wreck from minute one and never really found its footing. As far as your standard crime procedural goes, it filled in all the blanks, but made little to no effort to blaze its own trail, turn the genre on its ear, or reinvent a tired routine. The only real innovation is that apparently everyone in the world of The Forgotten is assumed to be telling the truth. Seriously, when one of the red herring ex-boyfriends is being interrogated by the police, he tells them he didn't do it and that he hasn't seen her in months and the detective just looks over her shoulder at Slater with a look of, "Well, that was a dead end... What do we do now?" Because the killer wouldn't have any reason to lie, you know. Indeed, when Slater confronts the actual killer, he rather incredulously notes that she lied to him. Well no shit, Sherlock. Of course she lied to you. Of course that goes against any sound reasoning for her coming forward in the first place, but coming up with something logical would have taken way too much effort, apparently.

At the end of the day, this was your typical crime procedural only schmaltzier. Every aspect was formulaic, thoroughly unoriginal, and predictable (I literally guessed that the victim would be from a small town in Iowa and sure enough, I was dead on). Even if you're a huge fan of crime procedurals, I'd recommend you pass on this derivative mess. It could be that I've seen this show just way too many times to be interested, but I found this pilot to be unwaveringly dull, lazy, and hackneyed from start to finish. I found myself wishing the show focused on one of the day jobs of the team members, because yes, I'd rather sit through an office staff meeting with team member Sunshine than continue to watch the same character cliches solve the same crimes over and over again. What can I say? Staff meetings are shorter and just might have cookies involved. I think we have a winner.

In short? Show FAIL.

Pilot Grade: F

Monday, July 6, 2009

ABC Pilots: Volume 2

I don't know exactly what ABC's schedule looks like for next year (they're so thoroughly subject to change that I don't generally bother until the time comes--plus, with the DVR, it doesn't really matter), but, given the sheer (shear?) volume, I have to assume that several of their pilots will premiere at midseason... It's looking like V, Deep End, and Happy Town will all start up around January. I am finally, finally, finally getting around to the rest of ABC's lineup. I tried to coax Annie into taking the reins on these, but she had a lot of non-wedding anniversary stuff to take care of...

At any rate, the rest of the contenders (those who weren't included in volume 1) are as follows:

THE FORGOTTEN




My Take: Well, right off the bat, for a show with as serious a subject matter as this, it seems pretty spectacularly cheesetastic... although I suppose that's a natural extension of earnest self-importance... It's honestly kind of difficult to even assess this kind of show after a while. This is an admittedly different angle on the procedural, but I'm not sure it's an improvement. Although the approach is a bit different, the end result and ultimate goals are still largely the same. This puts a bit more focus on identifying the victim than your usual crime show, but I don't think that's enough to re-invent this particular wheel. The victim's voice-over didn't really work for me and I'm hoping that was for the sake of the pilot and not an ongoing motif, but I'm guessing I'm wrong. In all honesty, this show will look a hell of a lot different when it actually becomes a series. Several cast changes have already been made, including the lead, and not for the better... Hot off the ignominious failure that was My Own Worst Enemy, Christian Slater will play Alex Donovan, a former lawman who heads up the "Identity Network" (which sounds more like a social networking site than a super-duper crime fighting team to me). The role was filled in the pilot by British actor Rupert Penry-Jones (BBC's Spooks). Also, the role of Linda is being recast as well. She was played in the pilot by Reiko Aylesworth from 24. Anyway, when major cast shake-ups occur, usually the whole entity undergoes some serious changes, so I expect this will turn into something quite different than what we're seeing now. Given the changes so far, and the fact that Jerry Bruckheimer has his sticky fingers involved, I'm afraid the changes won't be for the better.

Bottom Line? I think this is going to be yet another derivative crime procedural in an already overcrowded sea of derivative crime procedurals. I'll give it a shot, but I think my quota has already been filled.

V



My Take: I have to say, of all the pilots coming out this fall, V looks like it has the most potential for awesomeness. This series is based on a miniseries from the 80s that has a fairly substantial cult following. I never actually saw the miniseries, so I'll be embarking into this territory without any pre-conceived notions. Not only does the concept have a lot of potential, but the show boasts a pretty impressive cast thus far. Elizabeth Mitchell (of Lost fame) is headlining the show and she is joined by various Whedon alums who play fellow FBI peeps and aliens alike. The giant face in the sky belongs to Morena Baccarin (aka Inara from Firefly) and I believe that was Alan Tudyk playing one of Mitchells FBI comrades (I've heard conflicting information about his involvement in the show, but I'm wagering he'll be at least a recurring character, if not a regular). At first, it has an unfortunate Independence Day vibe, but fortunately said vibe was stolen from much better source materials, so I'm confident V will hold its own and avoid any and all Will Smith-related comparisons (I've only seen the trailer and can tell you it deserves much better). It may just be the sci-fi geek inside me, but I'm kinda sorta totally stoked to see Morena and company lull humanity into a stupor of admiration and devotion and then destroy the whole lot... Call me crazy, but that sounds like a grand old time. :) Sci-fi has had a hard run over the past few years, so I'm hoping to hell this show really knocks it out of the park and finds a following right quick. ABC has a better track record for such feats than, say, I don't know, Fox, so with any luck, it shouldn't be a problem. V will premiere at midseason, presumably after Lost's final season premiere.

Bottom Line? The whole affair looks solid from beginning to end. I've always enjoyed a show that appeals to a cult following. Add that to my Whedon devotion and the glowing reviews I've come across so far and I suspect this will feature prominently in my top tier. It looks to be a slick production from people who know what they're doing, so I'm confident it will handled in the right way. I kinda can't wait. :) Scott Wolf notwithstanding.

MODERN FAMILY



My Take: You know, at first glance, I assumed it would be awful, but it actually looks pretty decent. Good, I dare say. It's not often that a promo alone is enough to elicit even a smile from me, but the preview for Modern Family was actually pretty funny here and there. The single camera style is pretty much the norm these days and as far as I'm concerned, is totally welcomed. Anything that means there's no laugh track and I'm on board. I can't help but to think if Arrested Development had come out this year, it would have done oh-so-much better. Anyway, in kind of a similar vein, Modern Family is delightfully disfunctional (rather than desperately, laboriously disfunctional, which is so often the case). I'm not completely sold on the show, what with my hatred for children on TV and all, but this one seems to be hitting a much funnier and more enjoyable note than most. The scene on the plane really cracked me up. It just so simple and yet effective and funny to have the baby holding actual cream puffs that I couldn't help but to smile. And offering to pay for everyone's headsets? Perfect.

Bottom Line? When I first heard about this one, I assumed it would be your standard family comedy, but I'm very pleased to see that it has a lot more edge and a lot better approach than the crap that's currently out there. There aren't a lot of comedies that really strike the right chord with me, but, shocked as I am, I think Modern Family might just hit the right note. As long as it steers clear of the usual cliches and keeps an inappropriate edge, I think it'll work. Here's hoping.

THE MIDDLE



My Take: You know those standard, un-funny family comedies I mentioned in the Modern Family discussion? Yeah... The Middle is one of those. This show just appears to be trying so very hard to be funny that it totally isn't. The whole "haggard mother who doesn't know what happened to her life" routine is pretty played out (not that I cared to watch it the first 874 times) and I have the slightest tendency to completley loathe Patricia Heaton, so this one was off-putting from the get-go. It was a very short clip, but somehow way too long all at the same time. This show really doesn't seem to be up my alley or worth my time. When I saw that it was billed as "a sitcom about a Midwestern family living middle-American values," I pretty much knew it wasn't going to be love at first sight. I'd have lemon-lawed this sucker in seconds.

Bottom Line? I'll pass, thanks. I don't have children, don't want to have children, and don't need this show to remind me of just how much I don't want to have children in order to not have children. Blah.

HANK



My Take: The dreaded laugh track... It's annoying on principle, but when applied to something that doesn't actually elicit any laughing, it basically shines a spotlight on the un-funniness. Ugh. I generally quite enjoy Kelsey Grammer and adored the first several seasons of Frasier, but with this new gig, Grammer doesn't appear to have found his footing or really created a character. I realize that generally takes more than just a pilot to establish, but it was still kind of painful to see him so out of depth. It's not like it's the kind of role he couldn't handle, he just, well... didn't. The dialogue was clunky and forced, the jokes were ham-fisted, and the laugh track helped show me where the writers actually thought they were being funny, but totally weren't. It's the kind of concept that could work, if standard sitcom fare is your game, but I'm underwhelmed. And a little in pain.

Bottom Line? Well, um... it's good to see he's getting work? Ugh. It would take a whole hell of a lot to make this work and from what I've seen and read, it ain't gonna happen.

THE DEEP END






My Take: Well, show for show, this baby has more "oh hey, it's that guy!" than just about any other I've come across. Teeming with people who have been in a bunch of other stuff can be a detriment at times, but none of these were real headliners in previous projects, so I don’t think it’ll be a problem. Was that Billy Zane? He kind of fell of the planet… or should I say, into “the deep end”! Oy. Sorry, couldn’t resist. Anyway, this looks like kind of a throw back to legal shows of the late 90s, so I’m feeling a bit nostalgic. The tone looks to be more lighthearted than your usual hard-hitting drama, but toward the end of the preview, they seemed to be trying to walk the comedy/drama line and, sadly, not walking it very well. It has your standard legal show clichés and stereotypical characters, but that’s not to say it doesn’t have promise. There’s a reason that formula is so popular, after all. I’m just afraid that it won’t be able to really make its own mark and will lose my attention before I can really get invested. I adore Tina Majorino (she was one of the many wonderful aspects of Veronica Mars), but her character seems to be particularly (and intentionally) annoying, and not in a charming way, so that’s a downer. The rest of the cast appears to be decent enough and suitably charming for this kind of set up, so if the writers play their cards right, I don’t see why this couldn’t be a nice little genre piece. Taken in the wrong direction, and it could just be a derivative mess. Only time will tell.

Bottom Line? I’m not over the moon for this one, but it doesn’t look awful… yet. There were certain aspects to the preview that rubbed me the wrong way, but it looks watchable overall. I don’t think it’d ever be a first tier contender, but hopefully it’s good enough to grace the second.