Showing posts with label Three Rivers. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Three Rivers. Show all posts

Wednesday, October 7, 2009

Do you know where your organs are?

Having seen the promotional materials for the original pilot for CBS's latest drama Three Rivers, I must admit that the reworked pilot does appear to be improved, but it was a pretty low bar... The pilot still felt like I was watching an hour-long PSA for organ donation, but the revised storyline was slightly less pious than expected. Still self-righteous as all hell, but what can you do... I never thought I'd say this, but maybe CBS should have gone with another crime procedural instead... (You know, when 87 simply isn't enough.)

Three Rivers focuses on a team of organ transplant coordinators and surgeons who, well, transplant organs. That's pretty much the whole concept... Alex O'Loughlin plays Dr. Andy Yablonski (yes, I'm serious) as the best damn transplant surgeon in the country who works at a 22nd century hospital (apparently--seriously, when he started scrubbing the images like in Minority Report, I had to seriously wonder where the hospital's funding was coming from). He anchors the show and is supported by the likes of the wonderful Alfre Woodard and The L Word's Katherine Moenning. By all accounts, the cast is solid, but somehow the acting falls flat. I think the unconvincing action can be largely chalked up to the format of the show. In supremely cheesy fashion, the show follows patients who will ultimately be the organ donors and recipients, focusing entirely too much on their stories rather than focusing on the doctors' stories. While I appreciate that the audience needs to care about the patients (even though in this poorly executed mess, they don't), it's the doctors who will be around week to week and who should be more of the focus of the show. The actors try desperately to convince us that they're doctors (or saints, as is driven home every ten minutes), but fail pretty spectacularly. There are some excellent actors among the cast, but even the best of them make supremely unconvincing doctors. I've watched a lot of medical shows in my day and the medicine has to be accurate and the doctors have to feel at home with the material. While I can't vouch for the veracity of the medicine involved to great extent, I can certainly judge that none of the actors felt comfortable with their materials.

When the actors don't appear at home in their environment and don't seem fully capable in the profession they've adopted, all suspension of disbelief is taken off the table. When you don't believe these people are who they're supposed to be, you can't really care about them, their patients, or any ongoing storyline. That's the rather unfortunate case with Three Rivers and is the show's primary problem. As far as I'm concerned, ER sets the bar for believable doctors and medicine, and I don't know if I've just been watching too many old re-runs or what, but Three Rivers kind of drove me nuts with its inferiority in this regard. I couldn't, even for a moment, bring myself to believe that any of these people knew any about medicine at all. I saw them as actors first, last, and always. It was really very perplexing, I must say. On an objective level, I know that most of the show's leads are excellent actors and have show their talents in spades in other projects, but here? Well, quite frankly, it was easier to believe O'Loughlin as a supernatural, former blood-sucking detective than as a doctor... Not a good sign.

In the actors' defense, they weren't exactly given gold to work with. The writing was self-righteous and schmaltzy from beginning to end and often earnest to the point of being unctuous. Like I said, it really felt like the world's longest public service announcement. After one particularly ugh-worthy scene where the daughter of a would-be organ donor explains that she foolishly thought that signing an organ donation card meant that the doctors wouldn't try as hard to save someone, I fully expected the words "The More You Know" to fly across the screen on shooting star... The writing was eye-rollingly cheesy at times and the show's own self-importance as it informs an ignorant public about the gift of organ donation was pretty painful to watch. It was kind of like how those god awful Truth ads kinda make you want to start smoking just to spite them (or is that just me?). I had the sudden urge to repeal my donor status after watching this show... Or, as it said on the application I filled out at the DMV, my "live-saving anatomical gift" status. Seriously, ER did more for promoting organ donation and that was with the occasional B-plot. It's a noble cause, don't get me wrong, but I already know that. I don't need to be hit over the head with it. (Just like I know cigarettes are unhealthy, Truth squad. Everyone knows that. Stop trying to convince us of what we already know! Man alive, I hate those ads.)

The show's other failing is that while it tries very hard to be a pulse-pounding, edge of your seat drama, it's exceedingly dull instead. The show employs the requisite anxious/excited musical queues when they're trying to decide if someone gets an organ and when the organ is in transport, but it just feels out of place and unwarranted. I should be biting my nails, but I just don't care. There was no genuine urgency or fear and the writers' attempt at a ticking clock fell completely flat. It may boil down to the fact that I didn't believe any of these people were doctors or that I seriously couldn't have cared less about the patients of the week, but I felt no real investment in what happened to anyone. After all was said and done, I didn't mourn for the guy who died, my heart wasn't warmed by the woman who lived, and the little boy who didn't factor into any of this? Dull as he was, somehow he was the most interesting one... And yet I still don't know why he was there in the first place.

All in all, Three Rivers could have been a good show with a great cast and sustainable premise, but ultimately, nothing really came together and I was left bored and annoyed. In spite of negative publicity and the inauspicious re-tooling of the pilot, I really went into this wanting to like it. It has enough decent bare bones that it should have been able to make something work, but it failed. It's a real shame so many good actors found themselves in such an unbelievably boring, unengaging, self-righteous and even condescending pilot. The rest of the world seems to have agreed with me because the ratings weren't so good... I don't anticipate this sucker will be around for long.

The good news? Maybe Alex O'Loughlin will finally move on to a show that's worthy of his talents and has enough appeal to survive.

Pilot Grade: D+

Monday, June 15, 2009

CBS Pilots: The Good, the Bad, and the Alex O'Loughlin

Wow, CBS. Way to play the field... Only ONE new crime procedural?! I'm shocked! Although, given that that new crime procedural is a spin off of NCIS, I'm going to have to revoke all praise. Aside from that, I have to say that it is nice to see them at least trying to diversify their portfolio. Only one of their fall offerings really looks all that promising so far, but hopefully by fall they'll have a few more viable options.

In all honesty, CBS has never taken up much space on my schedule, so the bar is pretty high. I'm hopeful Julianna Marguiles can buck the trend, but it won't be easy. ABC has always had a better track record. As such, the write up of their fall season is taking longer than one would hope. Eventually, eventually...

Anyway, here's what CBS has planned:

THREE RIVERS



My Take:
Right off the bat? I'd say Alex O'Loughlin and his legion of Moonlight-lovin' devotees deserve much better. This looks like your run of the mill medical show, no matter how much they try to dress it up as something new and unique. This time, it's organ donors, recipients, and doctors, see... Yeah, not so much. The problem with focusing on one aspect of medicine is that it tends to pigeon-hole a series. One of the reasons ER was so successful is that it didn't focus on any one group in the hospital. In any given episode, there could be surgical patients (including organ donation scenarios), ER cases (well, duh), issues revolving around recurring patients, nurses, police, paramedics, hell, even the desk clerks. Having that kind of flexibility and variety kept things fresh for years and years. It looks like this show is angling for a procedural type approach to a medical show, and I have to tell you, I think that's going to get real old real fast. By and large, I really don't think I need an entire episode devoted to one set of medical circumstances. I already don't care if that kid will ever play basketball again (and didn't really care the first 874 times I saw a similar storyline elsewhere)... Also, the earnestness (and borderline saccharinity) of the doctors seems pretty eye-rollingly overbearing. It's a shame that such a promising cast (hey, hey! I thought I recognized Shane and lo and behold, it's her!) ended up in a pretty mediocre-looking show. Annnd, it sounds like I'm not the only one who's less than impressed so far. Looks like the brass at CBS is planning to re-tool the show before it premieres and will even do a fair bit of re-casting. The premise isn't terrible, really, it's just been done (and done, and done, and done). I'm hoping the revamp can add some life into this seemingly lackluster show. It's got decent bones to work with (wow, pun SO not intended) and a very promising cast, so I'm keeping my fingers crossed they can turn it into something viable. I happen to know a transplant surgeon, and from what I hear of his schedule, it really could be become something gripping, a little more unique, and a whole lot better. Seriously, this doctor I know only sleeps every third day... If that's a profession-wide phenomenon, you can go ahead and schedule me for surgery the morning after the third day, thanks.

THE GOOD WIFE


The Good Wife Promo - Behind The Scenes
by SeriesNet

My Take: I'm quite surprised, and a little delighted to say that this show actually looks really good. It may just be the vintage ER fan deep within me speaking, but Julianna Marguiles is just wonderful. This could have been your typical legal drama, but she infuses every role with something very real and engaging. I know so many women who have mortgaged their entire professional existence in a similar way to Marguiles' character and I've wondered how these women would fare if something horrible happened. I know there are rewards to raising children (so I've been told at least... I'm still on the fence), but the thought of taking such a promising career in something you're truly passionate about and just putting it on the back-burner for 13 years is unfathomable to me. And yet, it's so often the case. Better than that the scads of wives out there who have little to no education and practically no work experience to fall back in case of the unfortunate. As you can tell, I'm not an advocate of putting all your eggs in someone else's basket... Anyway, it's refreshing to see a character really take charge of her life after something so public, so humiliating, and so overwhelmingly game-changing happens. I think Marguiles is going to do great things with this role, and with a supporting cast that boasts Matt Czuchry (say what you will about Gilmore Girls, the kid can hold his own--god, I miss that show!) and Christine Baranski, I think The Good Wife has a hell of a lot of potential. In all honesty, it's been a long time since I had a good legal drama on my slate (since, like, The Practice, I dare say) and I'm hoping this little number lives up to expectations. Add to the solid foundation and excellent casting a clear, yet restrained sense of levity, and I think we have a winner here.

ACCIDENTALLY ON PURPOSE



My Take: Well, it's pretty much Knocked Up, the TV series, and I really, really, really hated Knocked Up... Granted, this doesn't look anywhere near as terrible as the film (what with the merciful lack of Katherine Heigl and the refreshing addition of a leading man who isn't utterly repulsive), but it's the same basic premise, only hopefully without all the same ridiculous trappings. What I hated most about the film was that the male characters were gross, unappealing, stupid, and useless and all the female characters where controlling, shrewish harpies. I don't know about you, but that's a whole lot of people I have no desire to watch (I still can't understand how anyone enjoyed that film even a little bit). Anyway, the cast here doesn't look anywhere near as repellant, so that's good, but the concept is still seriously lacking. Aside from just being a cheesy sit-com conceit, it once again begs the question of why she would go through with the pregnancy. For the sake of this show, I really hope they actually address that. Any woman who watched Knocked Up spent the better part of the film wishing to hell someone would either bring up the possibility of terminating the pregnancy or offering some sort of reason (anything!) that could explain why she's going through with it when it will undoubtedly uproot her life and ruin her career. I'm not saying there aren't viable reasons, because there totally are, but in Knocked Up, nothing is offered in any way, and it's ridiculous. I understand that the script was written probably entirely by men, and that that might not be as much of a consideration (at least that's the only explanation I can drum up), but for a couple who just met, have not chemistry whatsoever, and who DO NOT want a child, it's something even a male writer should have considered. Anyway, here's hoping this show has the brains to bring it up. I'm sorry this turned into a rant about a movie, but when the concept is this similar, the show has to be prepared for comparisons. In short, I already have a bias against this show, and then knowing that a child will be the focus of the second season (on the off chance it gets one), pretty much seals the coffin. Babies are the quickest way to ruin a show, so the good ones either avoid them entirely, or never actually have them as key plot points. This show has no such luxury. Blah.

NCIS: THE NEXT GENERATION (okay, so it's really NCIS: Los Angeles, but that's just no fun)



My Take: Never watched the first NCIS, no plans to watch this one. And if there's one thing I've learned about surveillance from Burn Notice, it's that it's boring. Seriously, when "surveillance snacking" is a square on our Burn Notice Bingo game (burn-o!), it's got to be pretty dull. So yeah, a show that's devoted to it? I'll pass. I've never understood why the original version was successful in the first place. What little I've seen has been pretty bad, if not extremely bad. Indeed, the only reason I've ever watched any of it is that I was stuck in a hotel room with nothing else on and no DVR to save me. Turns out, I should have just gone to bed. In spite of all this, knowing CBS, I fully expect you'll be seeing at least 3 or 4 dozen more spin-offs in the future. Maybe I'll give NCIS: Omaha a chance...