![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi6CqZihwWtQec-P5co0nOJzpPz3X_p7Rtkr3KThhYmeRVKrFLsi4vXOxmrUj46c1gVkuMRx0f6JUNwSXCO-lTIQQN_Js5pe-lC8bUcTKJmzIqraw7Xzf9XotatX5HScLthDxhptINmuKs/s320/bop.jpg)
Anyway, ABC has tried on numerous occasions to tap into the crime procedural genre, but has only really succeeded with Castle, which is one of the least conventional procedurals out there in terms of tone and execution. I think the reason Castle works where others have failed is that it has so much more fun with the old routine than other shows. Whereas the "quirky genius" on other procedurals is often cantankerous, insufferable, or the consummate know-it-all, Castle is creative and unassuming. He's wrong a hell of a lot of the time, but always helps in the end. Most importantly, he has a blast playing cops and robbers and brings a sense of childlike whimsy to the show. It makes the frequency with which he's correct charming, not grating.
Which brings me to Body of Proof, starring Dana Delany as Dr. Megan Hunt, a once-brilliant neurosurgeon turned near-preternatural medical examiner/crime solver.
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgl5_W2vcm39ZfHx-JXWYe3dqPwY8Hx3e4VJn5KQzOph2li5RR5B_hHeu2DmbUneQzQf6MIQo6gno2w7e6yVHyEvbmR7i4BTRnh6Og37YpcmiG7WJXmATDtAe6LOYmGQHW-7NZWowABk4Y/s200/BODY-OF-PROOF-DANA-DELANY.jpg)
Indeed, the entire cast is quite strong, but I found myself wishing they were attached to better projects. Delany is a power-player whom I always enjoy, but even she couldn't make this character intriguing or likable. In truth, she did more with the role than I would have expected, but there's only so much one can do with this set-up. Along with being the archetypal maverick genius who doesn't play by the rules but gets results, blah, blah, blah, which is so overused it's painful to watch, the writers have gone out of their way to give her as much quirk as possible in a failed attempt at uniqueness. I salute the efforts, but if it came down to watching a character I've seem a million times before or one who drives me and everyone
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh9WCEAF6HuKVOgJqSaBqwuLUx4ei2W9HvyhN6MrT4MTG_pFdoS1Qlm6JabEr24rF86k3pgRzYVaDu1vQkLZHAPKCrD_1hIGObqXPgc8XlRZLieme7y44TX9Ho6c4OVoxtTixDqenVkCcI/s200/body-of-proof.jpg)
This review is making the show sound considerably worse than it is, but believe me, it's more a matter of genre than execution here. For a crime procedural, this one was a solid effort, conforming to all the cliches and conceits in lock-step. So, if procedurals are you thing, this may very well be the show for you. For me? Good god, if you've seen this once, you've seen it a million times. The A-plot murder-of-the-week is hardly worth mentioning, because really, there are only so many different ways to kill someone, but it elucidated the character dynamics that will, no doubt, plague the series as a whole. The thought of watching the incredible Dr. Hunt toy with and belittle everyone around her (but, you know, in a half-assed, sassy sort of way) episode after episode is a complete turn-off. The reason House worked for as long as it did is that it was unapologetic and unreserved. He's an insufferable, snarky bastard first, last, and always. Dr. Hunt? They kept trying to go all the way with her character, but then they'd retreat. Instead of making for an interesting character piece, their hesitations at making her unlikable made her uneven and, well, unlikable.... so, well done, guys. I can see where they'd be hesitant to
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgRMNas8gi2YTRNa-jK9DmDgxGvwrZm2y4vTp7vuTvAeyUsl4hnawbU1xC8hUUpMfl-WsKhRKII-WWb4TPYKo4o8Ut_Y9kjIg-IX7p29o5kPzbB9R0lnPSiatT8kAxogeptzfrKNxaXaNA/s200/abcbodyofproof.jpg)
Indeed, the show seems to think that her interactions with the other characters on the show will be a central draw, but I found them irksome. I enjoy watching a blustering cop get put in his place, but seeing Dr. Hunt tear down a guy she doesn't even know and who didn't even do anything that bad wasn't satisfying or funny, it was ugh-worthy. Had it been handled in a different way, I think it could have been successful, but as is, it just seemed like a ham-fisted ploy to make Dr. Hunt seem like a ball-busting badass, but, you know, one that's real pretty and wears sexy high heels and winks at people. Yeah, yeah, she has better relationships with the dead than the living. We get it. I'm not saying that a person should be one thing all the time, that would be ridiculous, but Dr. Hunt just didn't seem authentic. At every turn, it felt like her character had been written one way, and then watered-down or sexed-up in hopes of appealing to the average viewer. Given that that's how the writing turned out, it's to Delany's credit that she balanced it as well as she did.
The supporting cast is decent enough, but inconsequential. I'm sure as the show progresses, they'll become more fleshed-out and whatnot, but at this point, they're really little more than pawns for Delany to play off of. Her lab partner ex-cop guy (or whatever he was) and eventual love interest was fine, but unmemorable, and the police force was mostly just a bunch of bumbling fools who probably couldn't figure out if it were Colonel Mustard or Miss Scarlett without the amazing Dr. Hunt determining that the victim had been
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjXvFXBKqxiX6V6UDslxU1YYG2Pp602vRHk5JhRW4qQFkZkHiSdJH09zYOKDjbFxnP2KrC88eJc7KmHFUCWkknyNdH8ftWE81paZs0w_az9tLVfqi4SFNmh6oTnb5Gx3OWBmniqXMYfSV0/s200/body-of-prood-trailer-18-5-10-kc.jpg)
All in all, it was a decent procedural when stacked up against other procedurals. It didn't have me cringing as much as most and honestly had better writing than ABC's previous attempts at the genre. That said, it was still a whole lot of the same. Delany did the best she could, but there are only so many ways to reinvent this particular wheel. I do think she could turn this role into something more over time, but I'm not invested enough in this set-up to give her that kind of time. The random crime-of-the-week isn't enough of a draw and the dysfunctional family dynamic wasn't established in a way that made me invest. Unlike Everwood, where I found myself instantly intrigued by the doctor who reevaluates his priorities after a tragedy, Dr. Hunt and her daughter barely caught my attention at all. In short, I've seen the whole "workaholic destroys relationship with children but then tries to make up for it" thing before, only better. Body of Proof wasn't a disaster, but it wasn't a coup either. I'll pass.
Pilot Grade (when compared to other crime procedurals): C+
No comments:
Post a Comment