Showing posts with label Cougartown. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Cougartown. Show all posts

Thursday, September 24, 2009

About last night...

After suffering through Mercy last night, I barely had the strength to power through the rest of Wednesday's new fodder. I simply haven't the strength to give them all their due, but at least one new show has made it onto my regular schedule.

MODERN FAMILY: Easily one of the best pilots of the fall. It has a mockumentary format (sans laugh track, thankfully), but felt more like Best In Show or A Mighty Wind than The Office, like I had expected. The lack of a laugh track always make shows easier to watch, but Modern Family had enough laughs that I probably wouldn't have noticed it. The show is quirky and light but definitely has an inappropriateness to it that I definitely enjoyed. It could have been your standard, tacky, cheesy, family sit-com, but the writers took it in a very different, and superior direction. I'm not sure what kind of long term potential it has at this point, but I'm confident the writers will make it work. It's not often that new comedies make it onto my rotation (what with them generally sucking and all), but I'm happily adding Modern Family and Community to my list. Both are definitely worth your time. I'm not married and I don't have kids (nor do I generally enjoy watching sit coms about either), but Modern Family totally makes it work. Pilot Grade: B+

COUGAR TOWN: I have to admit, it wasn't anywhere near as bad as I expected. I know, I know, I'm as shocked as you are. I'm not saying it was good, but I went in expecting it to be eye-gougingly painful and it was actually kind of watchable. I probably won't be tuning in again next week, but the pilot wasn't as train wrecky as it could have been, especially given the premise. Although I found Courtney Cox's portrayal of a recently divorced 40 something woman to be forced, over-eager, and desperate, she actually kinda sorta made it work. By all accounts, I should have hated every minute, but leave it to Courtney to make an annoying, whiny, neurotic nut-bag kind of likable. Overall, it was definitely heavy-handed and isn't the kind of show I'd be eager to see week-to-week, but no where near as off-putting as expected. I'm not sure exactly what demographic they're aiming for, but somehow the show pulled huge ratings with its premiere. It didn't suck me in, and I have little desire to watch Cox make an idiot of herself every week, but at the same time, I don't think it would appeal to an older demographic either. I expect the week two ratings will be considerably lower, and for as "not as awful as expected, though still not very good" as it was, I won't be sad to see it slip. If you happen to be a huge Courtney Cox fan or if you have figured out what demographic this show appeals to and happen to be a part of it, I guess you could give this one a shot... At least the clothes were cute? Pilot Grade: C

EASTWICK: I'm not even sure where to start with this one. It's kind of like Desperate Housewives meets Charmed. Bear in mind, I was never a big fan of either of those shows. The writers were clearly aiming for a quirky, light-hearted, magical romp, but it didn't strike a chord with me at all. I spent the better part of the pilot wishing it would just hurry and end. The writing was cheesy and uninspired, the acting was iffy, and the whole concept just kind of fell flat for me. I can see where there might be an audience out there that would totally love this show, but I was bored, bored, bored from minute one. The pilot just didn't really seem to have a whole lot of focus or drive and while a whole lot of things happened, it just didn't feel like they were really getting anywhere. Add to that the lingering instances of painful, painful, painful and you can see where this one won't be making it into my rotation. I'm generally quite a fan of the supernatural and the sudsy, but Eastwick sucked the life out of both. I can't even really quantify how and why exactly, but this pilot that should have been fanciful and fun managed to bore from beginning to end. It certainly didn't do it for me, but I can see where there might be some lonely, unicorn-loving people out there that might enjoy this... Pilot Grade: D+

Monday, June 22, 2009

ABC Pilots: Volume 1

Whew, finally I've made it to ABC's fall line-up. Granted, they announced their new slate of shows several weeks ago, but it took quite a while to sift through the other networks, so I'm only now getting to ABC. As with the other nets, the promising pilots are surrounded by a whole lot of crap. I, uh, can hardly wait...

For some reason, ABC seems to have a hell of a lot more pilots slated for next season than any other network, so that wasn't exactly enticing me to put this together any quicker. It has also led me to the decision to break this up into two posts.

Anyway, before we can move on to the new, here's the situation with the old.

AXED:
  • Cupid (which won't be missed), The Unusuals (which certainly will be missed), Samantha Who? (whose longevity of concept has always been in question), and According to Jim (whose success has always been a complete mystery).

PICKED UP:

  • Better Off Ted (yay!), Brothers & Sisters, Castle (double yay!), Desperate Housewives, Grey's Anatomy (groan!), Lost, Private Practice (double groan!), Scrubs (which will apparently be set in school now... oookay), and Ugly Betty. (Ugly Betty is being moved to the Friday death slot; Better Off Ted and Scrubs will airs Tuesday nights at 9 after Dancing With the Stars signs off in the fall.)
I'm completely psyched that Castle and Better Off Ted got picked up, but other than that, ABC has kind of fallen off my radar lately. Here's hoping the new crop can fill a few slots in my schedule. At present, there's entirely too much CBS on my plate for comfort...

Some pilots that you may have heard about didn't get the green light. ABC won't be tuning into The Bridget Show, starring Gilmore gal Lauren Graham as a talk-show host (according to Ausiello, it was unspeakably painful--i.e., it was so bad he declined to comment). Similarly, No Heroics (an intentionally funny version of Heroes) won't be gracing screens any time soon, and Limelight (a modern-day Fame) didn't quite make it.

Anyway, here are the newbies that did get the go ahead for fall:


FLASH FORWARD




My Take: As with so many other shows that start off with a very specific direction using a high concept pilot, I think this one could really go either way. I know ABC is hoping it goes the way of Lost, but there's always a good chance it will end up like The Nine or Six Degrees. If the audience buys into it and feels that the show has potential and promising longevity, it'll do well, if not, the show will be consumed by the concept and run out of steam early on. Given that the events of the "flash forward" appear to come to fruition in April 2010 (presumably the season finale), I have to wonder where the show would go from there. I'm hoping that the first season unveils a conspiracy, evil plot, or something or other that goes well beyond the flash forward itself. It looks like Joseph Fiennes will be charged with just such a task. Whatever is behind the blackout could take the show in great directions, or stop it dead in its tracks. My only concern is that if the week-to-week episodes don't handle this properly, the audience may lose interest before enough is revealed to make the show really work well. I'm intrigued, but cautious. There are a lot of shows that have come and gone that have had a crazy, mysterious shared experience that is illuminated over time to the audience. Some have been excellent, others have not. I think this one has a better chance for longevity than other recent entries into this pseudo-genre, so I'm hoping it makes the best of its high concept and really knocks it out of the park. Otherwise, I'm afraid I just won't care about "what they saw" and walk away. The cast appears to be very strong and the production values look solid. With the right writers and showrunner, I think this one could be a strong contender for fall, rather than the hokey Lost wannabe that it could be. Here's hoping.


COUGAR TOWN






My Take:
Um, wow... Yeah, so this show appears to be trying to tap in to a demographic which I do not represent, comprise, or have a hell of a lot of interest in... That said, I don't think this one is going to be my cup of tea exactly. I get the impression that the "cougar" concept will be beaten to death in the pilot and then they'll just keep pummeling that dead horse for the majority of the series. I'd like to think that that's not going to be the case, but the preview does little to allay my concerns. Add to that the fact that Courtney Cox's character appears to be supremely annoying and more than a little stupid and I'm less than thrilled with the whole concept of the show. The preview wasn't completely charmless (I kind of enjoyed the guy wolfing down crackers with peanut butter on them because he couldn't stop thinking about it), but overall, I just don't think Courtney is going to be able to pull this one off. Her character's interactions with her son, friends, and dates seems forcibly awkward and off-putting (although her son is played by that kid from Aliens in America, so that's a plus). I get that that's kind of the point, but I just don't think anyone who's as successful and accomplished as her character is supposed to be would be that socially inept. Anyway, I don't think I'll be giving this one much of a chance. If I'm in the mood for illicit hook-ups and tawdriness (and a hell of lot less awkwardidity), I'll watch some Gossip Girl, thanks.


EASTWICK






My Take: Well, on the up side, Cougartown is suddenly looking a whole lot better... Yeah, Eastwick doesn't look like anything that will make it onto my regular rotation. Bad acting, bad writing, bad concept, bad "dialogue," bad... fountain-y statue thing... The whole thing just looks horribly contrived and even more horribly executed. I don't know what it would take to make this one look like a winner, but I'm pretty sure all the magic in Eastwick won't be enough. Yikes. I never actually saw the '80s flick that inspired this turkey (The Witches of Eastwick), but I'm going to guess it wasn't exactly begging to become a series.


HAPPY TOWN




My Take: Well, right off the bat, I have to disclose some prejudice for and against this one. Although not featured in the preview above, Amy Acker (aka Dr. Saunders on Dollhouse and Fred from Angel (and who was not Penny from Dr. Horrible--sorry about that one, Jack, I don't know what the hell I was thinking)) is among the cast. While having her on the show will undoubtedly make Happy Town better, it might also mean that her commitments on Dollhouse will be reduced. I'm more than a little torn... Anyway, the show looks fairly promising. I wouldn't say it's one of my favorite conceits, but a good murder mystery is always a good time. This show seems to be aiming for a more stylized, sugar-sweet exterior with a dark side than the usual fare, so hopefully they pull it off and make it work. It's the kind of approach that could be awesome or awful. The cast looks very strong (including Sam Neil, Amy, of course, and Jerry from ER/Larry Kubiak). I'll definitely be giving this one a shot, but deep down, I'm mainly just hoping it doesn't interfere with Dollhouse... If Happy Town can strike the right balance between style and story, I think it could be a solid show. It certainly has a lot of good qualities to work with, but I'm just not sure this one is going to find an audience. I'll be giving it a shot, of course, but based on the preview alone, it's striking me as a second or third tier show at most. I'll be truly surprised if it manages to grace the top tier (being all hallowed and lofty like it is).

Well, those are some of the new shows we can expect from ABC next year. Stay tuned for volume two, which will feature ABC's most anticipated new show (at least it's the most anticipated show in my circles), V, among various others