Showing posts with label Blue Bloods. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Blue Bloods. Show all posts

Monday, September 27, 2010

Not Your Typical Cop Drama... THANKFULLY

As premiere week finally drew to a close and Friday was upon me, I couldn’t help but smile at the knowledge that I was presumably done blogging about new shows for a while and was giddy to get back to the business of writing about shows I already love (the Castle and Vampire Diaries premieres were off-the-hook fabulous). Sure I skipped a few pilots (I think the only ones I didn’t screen at all were Chase, Mike & Molly, and Outsourced), but by and large, I watched them all, for good or bad (sadly, mostly bad). I DVRed CBS’ Friday night offering, and definitely had plans to watch it, but didn’t have any intention of blogging about it. Well, in a bizarre twist of fate, new show Blue Bloods is actually an interesting family drama/character piece masquerading as a random cop show. Given the relative lack of decent pilots this season, I’m compelled to write about this one just to give a little balance to the good and the bad.


It wasn’t a perfect show or anything, but I found myself interested and intrigued from start to finish. I expected it would by your typical genre show, but it’s actually a serious drama about multiple generations of a New York family, many of whom happen to be cops. The show centers around patriarch Tom Selleck as chief of police Frank Reagan, his father, the former chief, and his children, a homicide detective (Donnie Wahlberg…ugh), an assistant DA (Bridget Moynahan), and a Harvard law student turned rookie cop (Will Estes). It’s not a cop show in the same way that Nurse Jackie isn’t a medical show. The fact that those are their professions is largely incidental. Sure it sets the scene and creates a universe for these people to exist, but it’s more about how the characters interact with this world and with each other rather than the world itself. As I’ve mentioned in previously, when you’ve seen enough genre shows and have sat through more than a few legal dramas, medical shows, and crime procedurals, it simply has to come down to characters. The cases of the week quickly become secondary to interpersonal dynamics and character development because if you’ve seen one murder mystery, car accident, or missing kid, you’ve seen them all.

Indeed, when a young girl was kidnapped, I feared Blue Bloods had started veering down the path of standard cop show. In some ways, this pseudo-victim-of-the-week was the weakest part of the pilot. Just when it wasn’t horrible enough that a girl had been kidnapped, she also happens to be a diabetic so the cops are forced to find her within 24 hours or she’s dead for sure. I assumed this was yet another lame device used by shows to add suspense. The “ticking clock” can be useful and all, but it usually comes across as little more than a ploy. In terms of the A-plot, that’s an apt description, but the ways in which this storyline affects the characters marks a clear divergence from the norm and is the reason this pilot was so successful. Because of the ticking clock, Wahlberg’s character brutalizes a suspect in order to find the girl in time. As such, the evidence gathered might be inadmissible and the pedophile might walk because of his actions. This situation raised a lot of questions about justice, law enforcement, and the use of force. The family comes down on both sides of the debate, some saluting Wahlberg’s actions, others condemning. While hearing Selleck’s character justify the use of “enhanced interrogation techniques” was fairly stomach-churning, there are absolutely people out there who believe torture is valid and the A-plot for this pilot helped bring the debate to the table (quite literally in this case as family dinner turns into a bit of blood bath). Both sides of the debate were represented, although I do wish the liberal side of the table had pointed out the obvious: it doesn’t matter where you fall on this issue, Wahlberg’s actions almost let a pedophile walk. Anyway, their heated discussion was uncomfortable to watch (what with my wanting to jump in every two seconds but not being able to), but it brought a very serious and relevant issue into the television dialogue and that was a refreshing change of pace. Most shows would have shied away from the ramifications of police brutality, usually heralding the abuser as a hero, but Blue Bloods put it front and center. If that weren’t enough, the girl who was kidnapped was Hispanic, bringing issues of race and police response to the forefront as well. This show seemed to go out of its way to take a standard cop show cliché and build actual characters around it.

This is a show about people, a family, and the effects that enforcement can have on that family. While I didn’t like some of the characters and often disagreed with their political views, they were all compelling and well-founded. It didn’t seem that half the family landed on one side of the issue and the other have on the other side in a convenient bid for drama. The set-ups for each of these characters made their responses to the issues before them logical, or at the very least, believable. Tom Selleck does a very nice job playing the patriarch, the enforcer, the boss, and the politician. He anchors the family and the show with a decisive, but open hand. The rest of the cast is equally strong, with the possible exception of Donnie Wahlberg… Bridget Moynahan is excellent as strong, smart assistant DA Erin and Will Estes excels at convincing me that he’s smart enough to have been a Harvard lawyer, but that he has always wanted to be a cop. In all honesty, Wahlberg did a respectable job in his role, I just can’t stand him as an actor. I can’t even really put a finger on it, but there’s just something about him that’s completely off-putting. The fact that his character is equally unlikable to me actually makes this perfect casting, I suppose. I assume he’ll grown on me, and his character wasn’t completely without merit, but my initial response is mostly negative. His acting was fine and all (although he had about 80% more accent than any of his family—maybe he was recently adopted...), so maybe it’s just that I don’t find him physically appealing at all. I hate to admit my shallowness here, but I just don’t find him attractive in any respect, either physically or personalitally (ohh, it’s a word). Although I guess the shallowness comes as little surprise given that I’ve officially watched five seasons of Criminal Minds because Matthew Gray Gubler is beautiful (okay, that’s not the only reason, but it's first on the list).

Anyway, the base concept is solid and the pilot went a long way to set up a world for these characters to inhabit. This show is far more than your standard cop show and that’s a lovely surprise. To boot, it’s a serial, which always wins points in my book. I watch a number of shows that are one-off procedurals (the kinds of shows where you can skip a dozen episodes then come back to the show and feel like you haven’t missed a thing), but they’re never my favorites. Even shows that technically have case-of-the-week type elements need something more for me. So, when I get a show that’s truly a serial, I sit up and take notice. Along with the social and political issues and the multi-generational family dynamic, the pilot also sets up an intriguing story arc regarding the death of the fourth Reagan child in the line of duty. Not all is what it seems and police rookie Will Estes gets drawn into a conspiracy that might very well indict his fellow police officers and even his family.

I was surprised by this show. It had some elements that I would change and the occasional genre cliché, but more than anything it’s a solid family drama that isn’t afraid to examine hot-button issues. There’s only so much that can fit into 42 minutes, so certain aspects of the show were a little more convenient than I’d prefer, but the show makes it work. Given that it airs on Fridays, I didn’t think it would perform very well, but it actually won the night, getting a 2.2 rating in the key demo and 12.8 million total. That’s not bad for any night, but on a Friday at 9 pm? Quite impressive. Hell, it fared better than Undercovers by a long shot and killed its atrocious timeslot competitor Outlaw. In all my ratings predictions, I never saw that coming. Fortunately, it’s deserving of the attention and certainly deserving of my eyes than J.J. Abrams’ boring, uninspired dramedy. It’s not often that quality actually wins out in the ratings department, but it happens.

If cop shows aren’t you cup of tea (or even if they are), Blue Bloods has a lot to offer and a solid foundation on which to build. It could go in a lot of different directions and I’m happy to see where it ends up. Plus, the fact that it airs on Fridays is an added bonus in my book, what with total lack of scheduling conflicts.

I’m as shocked as you are, and maybe it’s the pilot fatigue talking, but based on the pilot, Blue Bloods one is worth a shot.

Pilot Grade: B

Friday, August 27, 2010

CBS Pilots: Changing things up a bit...

Not only is CBS changing things up a bit, but so am I. Rather than break up the CBS slate of pilots into two digestible blogposts, I'm just going put the whole magilla into one. What can I say, we're in the home stretch and I'm getting lazy.

CBS, however, is actually putting forth more effort than usual. Rather than simply spinning off their library of crime procedurals into even more crime procedurals, they've actually added some variety to their fall line-up. Oh, don't you worry, the bulk of it still fits into the standard TV genres, but at least it's not all from the same genre for once. Hopefully the success of The Good Wife is what bolstered their confidence, but really, I'm guessing it's the sagging ratings of their aging line-up that led to some toe-dips out of the box. Whatever the reason, it's a nice change.

Here is how the new fall schedule is stacking up:

MONDAY
7:00 pm How I Met Your Mother
7:30 pm Rules Of Engagement
8:00 pm Two And A Half Men
8:30 pm Mike & Molly (new)
9:00 pm Hawaii Five-0 (new)

TUESDAY
7:00 pm NCIS
8:00 pm NCIS: Los Angeles
9:00 pm The Good Wife

WEDNESDAY
7:00 pm Survivor
8:00 pm Criminal Minds
9:00 pm The Defenders (new)

THURSDAY
7:00 pm The Big Bang Theory
7:30 pm $#*! My Dad Says (new)
8:00 pm CSI
9:00 pm The Mentalist

FRIDAY
7:00 pm Medium
8:00 pm CSI: NY
9:00 pm Blue Bloods (new)

SUNDAY
7:00 pm The Amazing Race
8:00 pm Undercover Boss
9:00 pm CSI: Miami

Why CBS does some of the things it does in terms of scheduling, I'll never understand, but whatever. I realize that both NCIS and The Good Wife skew older, but I can't imagine it's really the same demographic of older. Their placement of Hawaii Five-0 also has me scratching my head. It's one thing for people to stick around after the god-awful, but shockingly successful Two and a Half Men for Mike & Molly, but it's quite another to think they'll stick around after that. If Mike & Molly is a dud, then a lot of the lead-out from Two and a Half Men could be seriously diminished. It seems like a risky move to me. I would have paired Hawaii Five-0 with a returning show directly. Whatever. I'm sure it'll do fine regardless (barring Alex O'Laughlin's showkilling abilities, that is).

Anyway, on with the show! ...er, shows!

HAWAII FIVE-0

Description: Stars perennial showkiller Alex O'Laughlin, Lost alum Daniel Dae Kim, Scott Caan (Ocean's Eleven), and Grace Park (Battlestar Galactica). The behind-the-scenes talent has changed hands a few times, but I believe they settled on Alex Kurtzman and Roberto Orci to script a pilot episode, and Peter Lenkov (CSI: NY) to serve as series showrunner.



My Take: Well, first off, no one can seem to decide if that's a zero or an "o" in the title... I saw a tweet that CBS issued an official memo, but I can't remember what is said and neither can anyone else. I believe it's supposed to be a zero, but that looks awfully funny depending on what font you're in. Anyway... This is a remake/reimagining of the original series from the 70's. I have to admit, I have never seen even a single episode of the original, so I came into this latest incarnation without any substantial pre-conceived notions. Coming in blind generally helps more than it hurts because shows don't have anything to live up to or exceed in my mind. As such, the trailer was pretty solid and managed to pique my interest (for more reasons than the simple fact that Spike appears to be the baddie-of-the-week in the pilot--yay!). Unlike the majority of cop shows coming down the pike, Hawaii Five-0 seems to be taking the splashy, fun-loving, thrill ride approach, rather than the gritty, nastily realistic approach of its genre compatriots. It's a bit of a throwback to older buddy cop shows, which I guess makes sense, what with it being a remake and all. I wouldn't say I'm on the edge of my seat for this one, but it looks like some low-commitment, carefree fun. I've always liked Alex O'Laughlin, even if his latest career moves have been... uh... how to put this gently...? Okay, he's a showkiller, plain and simple, but I think the shows he's been on had already signed DNRs, so he's a mercy showkiller. I don't think anyone is going to miss Three Rivers... Hopefully, third time really is the charm for O'Laughlin's relationship with CBS. If ever a show he was associated with looked like it could break his bad streak, I'd say it's this. It looks a little shallow, but that's what most people seem to like. I'd like to believe that it's a serial, but I'm willing to wager it'll have a bad-guy-of-the-week and get wrapped up in a nice, neat little bow at the end of every hour. Sigh. If they do it right, that's fine with me. I've learned to accept the fact that most Americans can't bring themselves to follow a storyline for more than one episode at a time, so I've learned to enjoy encapsulated episodes in their own right. Long story short, this looks like a slick, expensive production with a solid cast. I've never watched CSI: NY, so in terms of showrunners, I can't really offer much of an opinion, but I think we can all thank our lucky stars that at least he's not coming from CSI: Miami. I think this show will do very well and just might have enough panache and budget to pull this off. I'll definitely be giving it a shot.


MIKE & MOLLY

Description: From Chuck Lorre (“Two and a Half Men,” and “The Big Bang Theory”), stars Billy Gardell and Melissa McCarthy (Sookie from Gilmore Girls, not True Blood (yeah, cause that wouldn't be weird at all)), and the resplendent Swoozie Kurtz.



My Take: Okay, wow. I shouldn't be surprised considering Lorre's other shows, but Mike & Molly looks absolutely terrible (The Big Bang Theory is okay, I guess, in small doses, but Two and Half Men is positively pestilent). I didn't even crack a smile during this trailer. I'm a little conflicted though because I keep reading things on the web that says the full pilot is actually pretty charming and funny. Based solely on what I've seen so far, I find this hard to believe. Near as I can tell, it's just going to be 23 minutes of fat jokes and lame relationship anecdotes. I love Melissa McCarthy and her comedic timing is unimpeachable, but I'm afraid the jokes she was given fell pretty flat. She tried, she really did, but it all just struck me as predictable, forced, and stupid. The only reason I will even be screening the pilot is because I have heard some good reviews, but I'll be absolutely shocked if it's anything but painful to watch. Honestly, getting through the three minute trailer was fairly difficult... Also, on a purely shallow note, I have a hard time watching unattractive people engaged in romantic relationships, and the guy playing Mike is thoroughly unappealing... Sookie can do better, methinks. Much better. In all honesty though, I doubt I'll be around long enough for it be an issue.


BLUE BLOODS

Description: Stars Tom Selleck, Donnie Wahlberg, Will Estes, and Bridget Moynahan. From executive producers Robin Green and Mitch Burgess (The Sopranos).



My Take: Man alive, exactly how many new cop shows and I going to have to watch this fall? At last count, I think we hit 17. The glut makes it difficult to really get excited about any of them at all. Anyway, I find that I'm even less excited about this one than most, but I can't quite pinpoint why exactly. There's something off-putting about police officers in general (police work and military experience are pre-existing conditions as far as I'm concerned and are not covered under my dating policy) and unlawfully brutal police officers are even worse. Seriously, just hearing Tom Selleck say the words "enhanced interrogation techniques" made me a little ill. Which, to the show's credit, is probably the point. They are trying to stir a debate into the nature of justice, which is commendable, but not exactly appointment TV for me. I'm not really on the fence in this particular debate, so hearing it discussed at length doesn't really appeal to me. Anyway, I don't suppose that's going to be the central aspect of every single episode or anything and it really does point to a deeper, more conscientious narrative construct than most shows. Maybe it boils down to Donnie Wahlberg and his total lack of any and all appeal... Sigh. I'm mildly intrigued by the multi-generational family and the dynamics of a "family business" of sorts, but I'm not sure this is a capacity in which I'd want to explore it. In spite of Wahlberg, the on-air talent is seasoned and solid. The creative team has similarly impressive pedigrees. I never watched much of The Sopranos, but I'm well aware of its sustained quality over the years. I think the problem here is that this creative team is moving from the freedom of HBO to the confines of primetime network TV. Gritty crime dramas have a hard time being reined in by standards and practices in general, but for a team like this, I think they're going to have a hell of a time translating their style to a more family-friendly format. My other concern is that this show is premiering on Fridays at 9 pm, so I think finding an audience is going to be difficult. CBS has a better track record with this timeslot than other networks, however, so if anyone could pull this off, it's them. I'm not all that excited for this one, but I can definitely see where it could be better than it looks.


THE DEFENDERS

Description: Stars Jim Belushi, Jerry O'Connell, Jurnee Smollett, Tanya Fischer, and Gillian Vigman. Created by a couple of people I've never heard of...



My Take: Okay, so when I say CBS is changing things up a bit, I mean in terms of the CBS network brand only. In terms of TV, yeah, no, they're just as pathetically "business as usual" as the rest of the airwaves. Sigh. Here we have yet another lawyer show. Dear TV Writers, there are scads of workplaces that would make for interesting show settings, but you only seem to think there are three: lawyers, cops, and doctors. If you could casually dip your toe into something, anything else, it would be greatly appreciated. Honestly, this is getting ridiculous. Anyway... this show is a legal show, but it's totally different, see, because it's told from the point of view of the defense! Sooo... not different at all, then? I don't know. It's hard to be objective at this point. This looks like your standard client-of-the-week lawyer show, but I suppose with a more low-brow edge to it than usual. It looks like it could be a fun, low-commitment show, but at this point, I'm so weary of this genre that I just can't bring myself to be excited about it. Really, The Good Wife is the only recent legal drama that has brought something new and interesting to the table, and that's why I love it. This doesn't look like a bad show or anything, and the two leads have an obvious buddy chemistry going that's appealing, but I just don't know that I really care. What aspect of the trailer piqued my interest the most? The fact that Natalie Zea was in it. She isn't listed as a series regular or anything, so I assume she's only in the pilot, which is a good thing for Justified's sake, but not such a good thing for The Defenders. I'm sure I'll end up giving this show a shot, but as with the deluge of cop shows, I find myself looking for something newer and fresher to explore. With legal, doctor, and cop shows? I'm pretty sure I've seen it all.


$#*! MY DAD SAYS

Description: Stars William Shatner, Will Sasso, Nicole Sullivan, and Stephanie Lemelin. From the creators of Will & Grace.



My Take: Yeah, you lost me at "Based on the Twitter sensation"... Ugh. While this isn't the worst comedy trailer I've seen this year, it's pretty damn close. This looks pretty awful. I actually quite liked Will & Grace back in the day, and the creative team has other impressive credits as well, so I'm not sure what happened here. Maybe it's the multi-camera format, maybe it's the oppressive laugh track, maybe it's the weak-ass concept, maybe it's the Shatner, but whatever it is, it isn't working. Geez, even Nicole Sullivan is awful in this, and I quite like her in general. As with most CBS comedies, I don't think this one is going to win me over. And, from what I've been hearing on the web, it won't be winning over anyone else either. It's a lame concept, with forced, predictable jokes, and an unsuccessful attempt at giving it some heart as well. Thanks, but no thanks. I'll pass.