At any rate, CBS is in extremely good shape at the moment, but they have a lot of aging shows that will need to be replaced eventually (sooner than later, if they know what's good for them).
Here's the schedule for fall:
MONDAY
8/7c How I Met Your Mother
8:30 pm PARTNERS
9 pm 2 Broke Girls
9:30 pm Mike & Molly
10 pm Hawaii Five-0
TUESDAY
8 pm NCIS
9 pm NCIS: LA
10 pm VEGAS
WEDNESDAY
8 pm Survivor
9 pm Criminal Minds
10 pm CSI
THURSDAY
8 pm The Big Bang Theory
8:30 pm Two and a Half Men
9 pm Person of Interest
10 pm ELEMENTARY
FRIDAY
8 pm CSI: NY
9 pm MADE IN JERSEY
10 pm Blue Bloods
SUNDAY
8 pm The Amazing Race
9 pm The Good Wife
10 pm The Mentalist
DEAD AS A DEAD DEAD: CSI: Miami, A Gifted Man, How to Be a Gentleman, NYC 22, Rob, and Unforgettable.
All the dead weight they cut needed to be but and deserved to be cut. They shant be missed. With only a few new slots in the schedule though, CBS only has room for a handful of new shows for fall and I have yet to see much of anything for their midseason. Here are the newbs:
PARTNERS
My Take: As mentioned, it’s harder to
evaluate shows that have a feature video rather than a traditional trailer, so
bear with me. Comedies are tough to
parse in bite-sized pieces, but I think this show has some definite
potential. After the characters have
actually settled into their roles and the story finds its feet, Partners could
be a lot of fun. The cast is exceptional
(LOVE Michael Urie and David Krumholtz has the Whedonverse backing him) and the
writing talent is responsible for Will
and Grace, a show I quite enjoyed back in the day. The set-up takes your standard “attractive
people dating other attractive people” comedy and puts a bit of a tweak on
it. Not exactly reinventing the wheel,
but hopefully the actors and writing will bring something fresh to it. At the very least, everyone knows the
trepidation of friends and lovers interacting, so in terms of ratings and
reliability, it has a lot going for it.
The laugh track is going to be a real turn off if the comedy is anything
less than gold, so they’ll have to really work for it, as HIMYM does. Partners looks to be an ideal pairing
for HIMYM, so even though ABC’s
scheduling department appears to have dropped acid before throwing darts at the
calendar, CBS actually seems to know what they’re doing. All in all, this looks like a charming, if
fairly conventional sitcom that should be good for a low commitment, easy
show. PS—500 points for naming the dog Elphaba.
Potential-O-Meter: 6.8
VEGAS
Potential-O-Meter: 6.8
VEGAS
My Take: Dear Vegas. Justified, you ain’t. I tried appreciating the nuances of the show and its concept, but by and large, seeing a rule-breaking cowboy in a hat just makes me pine for Raylan. More so. If I had to assess this show, I’d say I’m already kinda bored. The mob, in general, doesn’t excite me. As far as bad guys are concerned, they’re some of the least interesting (with more modern mobsters even less captivating that older ones). I’ll make exceptions for shows like Boardwalk Empire, but even then, I’m not as intrigued as I am by other concepts. The cast and production look solid, however, so if they can create a story that can bypass my biases, this could be a quality show. Indeed, from what I’ve seen, this definitely looks like it could be a good show, just maybe not my show. Michael Chiklis is awful, but I enjoy Dennis Quaid well enough (although the bad fake accent decreases my appreciation of him by at least 24%). Overall, this behind-the-scenes vignette felt a little flat to me. Maybe it’s my sensibilities, maybe it’s the show itself, but I’m far from taken with this show, its concept, and its cast. I’ll give it a shot, of course, but I’m not hopeful. I think it might be a hard sell for CBS, but who knows. I don’t watch NCIS, so it’s hard to match up demographics, but maybe all those people who love NCIS will love Vegas. Doubtful, but CBS has a good enough track record that I wouldn’t count it out.
Potential-O-Meter: 4.1
ELEMENTARY
ELEMENTARY
My Take Oy. Dear America, please stop. If I weren’t such a huge fan and devotee to
the brilliant British version of a modern Holmes and Watson, I’m not sure how
I’d react to this show, but seeing as I am, I’m annoyed. Again.
American adaptations are almost universally inferior and unnecessary, so
my knee jerk reaction is to simply write this off wholesale and go watch Sherlock instead. In fact, that would probably be the best
recommendation I could make. Rumor has
it there was a fair bit of scrutiny of this show for copying Sherlock hook,
line, and inferior sinker, but the writers here very cleverly made Watson
female. On the surface, I have no
problem with gender switches when adapting material. It has worked a number of times in the past
to great success. But seriously, Joan Watson? Man alive, you couldn’t have just given her
an entirely different first name?
Cheesy. Extremely cheesy. Anyhow, strictly on its merits, it looks like
CBS has taken a classic and turned it into a very typical, very uninspired
crime procedural that probably has nothing to do with Sir Arthur Conan Doyle
whatsoever. That said, one of the
executive producers has been involved with some excellent shows for HBO and
Showtime, so hopefully he’ll bring a little something extra to the
picture. He’s more accustomed to working
with pay cable though, so I’m guessing he’ll find the constraints of network TV
to be stifling, not inspirational. Were
this on HBO, I’d have a much better feeling about it. As it, not only does it have to try to live
up to the superb British series, but it has to do so in a way that middle
America will tune in on a network that won’t allow for any creative
expression. Yeah, good luck with
that. I don’t have high hopes. Even if the show turns out to be pretty good,
it will never surpass its predecessor.
Indeed, it shouldn’t be trying. I
like Johnny Lee Miller and Lucy Lui a hell of a lot, but I think it’s going to
be nearly impossible for the show to hold its own, even with a great cast. We’ll see.
But I’m going to cite precedent on this one and assumethe worst.
Potential-O-Meter: 5.3
MADE IN JERSEY
MADE IN JERSEY
My Take: Yeah, no. Good god, seriously, there have got to be more ideas out there for
shows. Here we have yet another lawyer
show, about an young upstart who’s seen Legally
Blonde a few too many times, making her way in the big city, blah, blah,
blah, I’m bored. Not only am I bored,
I’m rolling my eyes. A genre show can be
a great show, but only if it brings something new to the table. The Good Wife is a lawyer show on the
surface, but it’s so, so much more than that.
With Made In Jersey, I see no
such depth. God, it’s like the network
execs thought to themselves, “How could we make a show like The Good Wife, but that appeals to the
masses more… I know! Throw in Jersey
Shore!” No, Phil (I assume his name
was Phil). That is a terrible idea. Man alive, if I have to watch one more show
where the experienced team members are blown away by the brilliant newcomer
cracking the case, I might cry. The fact
that CBS has sentenced this show to Friday, after the fading CSI: NY implies
that I’m not the only one with fairly little confidence in this show. I’m fine with “the same old thing, only
better,” but I have zero patience for “the same old thing, only worse.” There was pretty much nothing in that
vignette to recommend the show, so I think I’ll be sticking to my other
networks for Friday night offerings. CBS
just doesn’t seem to want to try very hard on a difficult night (in their
defense, they don’t really need to, but still).
Potential-O-Meter: 3
Potential-O-Meter: 3
There you have it. They only had a small handful of slots open to them and they decided to fill them with all that. CBS, it's hard to argue with your business model given your sucess and your willingness to keep The Good Wife for me to enjoy, but this is a pretty disappointing slate for this fall. Here's hoping that these shows are better than they look.
No comments:
Post a Comment