Tuesday, September 22, 2009

Script Writing 101: The Crime Procedural

After suffering through the mediocrity that the CW had to offer, I was really hoping the real networks would have something better to offer. I watched ABC's latest outing, The Forgotten, and, well... How to put this gently... So far, so... bad...? Oh, so bad... Wow.

I knew going in that anything that had Jerry Bruckheimer's sticky fingers involved probably wouldn't be very good, but I tried to have an open mind. Even after the show was completely retooled and recast from its previous incarnation, I was willing to give it a shot... Then Christian Slater came on board... There's only so open a mind can be, people...

The Forgotten felt like I was watching a mad lib about crime procedurals. The writers filled in all the obvious blanks with run-of-the-mill answers and out came your standard crime drama filled with murder, and in this iteration, a fair amount of cheese and boredom. The pilot was uninspired, unoriginal, and eye-rollingly predictable from start to finish. Even in the areas where the writers were trying to reinvent the wheel, they seem to have created a spare tire.

The only real difference between The Forgotten and every other crime procedural you've seen a million times is that the writers filled in the "voiceover by" blank with "the victim." A group of civilian crime-solvers go through the motions of figuring out who Jane Doe is while her voice blathers on about life and death and whatnot in the dullest fashion possible. I have a sneaking suspicion that someone read The Lovely Bones and decided to appropriate the idea... only with much less successful results. It doesn't come across as raw and insightful as it does in the book, but rather pummels the viewer with gimmicky would-be insights that felt insincere and contrived. It didn't make me care more about the girl who died and didn't allow me a window into a foreign experience. Voiceovers rather often fall flat for me and this is no exception. In this instance, however, rather than offering plot exposition or the inner thoughts of one of the protagonists, its the musings of a character whom we'll never see again and who's already dead. Overall, the voiceover struck me as unnecessary and lame. The voice is talking to us the whole time, but unlike The Lovely Bones, the victim doesn't tell us anything about her death until the characters in the show have wrapped everything up in a nice, neat little bow. Then and only then does the voiceover go into the elaborate wrap-up and lays out what happened and why. Given that the audience has just spent the last 41 minutes watching people figure all this out, it's not only unnecessary, but fairly redundant. But the writers didn't stop there. Want another motif lifted from the book that didn't really work as well here? Yeah, the investigators see visions of the dead girl walking around in the various locales they search. Oy.

The team is lead by Christian Slater who's hot off his most recent failure, My Own Worst Enemy. I don't like labeling anyone a showkiller, but he certainly seems to pick some real winners. Within minutes, it became painfully obvious that he'd be filling the role of "guarded leader with a personal connection to his work." To absolutely no one's surprise, the writers filled in the "personal tragedy" blank with "disappearance of daughter." It's what drew him to this gig and is what makes him the best in the business and drives him to work harder and blah, blah, blah. As far as a protagonist is concerned, I've seen this one a million times before, only better. Slater brings nothing new or interesting to a role that the writers appear to have slapped together in 20 minutes. It's as though they were in a script writing class and had to finish a project just before class. They took the list of required elements and doled out as necessary to fulfill the quota. Soup to nuts, I'm bored.

Along with Slater, the forgotten network (groups of freelance civilians all across the nation who come together with the police to identify Jane and John Does, of course--what? You've never heard of this either? Well, just go with it! I have Biology class in 10 minutes!) includes your standard band of characters: the overly attractive woman who has also suffered personal tragedy (and who will become the obvious love interest for Slater) but hides her pain with a sad smile, the other overly attractive, but younger woman who is the positive, earnest, go-getter of the group, the overweight guy who will be providing comic relief, and lest you think the writers decided to break out of the box for the final character, we have "the new guy" filled in the blank for "vehicle for plot exposition."

As with oh-so-many pilots, crappy writers feel like they need to explain every single aspect of a world to the audience, because clearly we're too damn stupid to figure anything out for ourselves, draw any informed conclusions, or be comfortable with not knowing the minutia of a show for 10 minutes. The new guy/girl on a show assumes the role of the audience and is a means by which the writers can explain everything to us by having the other characters have to explain everything to him. It's lazy and easy and annoying to watch. Ugh. Great pilots don't need such a vehicle. Bad pilots require some sort of big ass SUV, and really bad pilots? I'm going to go with aircraft carrier... The vehicle for this pilot falls somewhere in between. I couldn't stop rolling my eyes and groaning it was so lame and embarrassingly convenient. Yeah, so not only does he play "new guy," but he also plays "rebel," and "special skills" guy as well. In order for the writers to not have to try very hard in the future, they very conveniently made "new guy" a--wait for it--med school drop out who happens to be a sculptor. Why, that's the exact skill set a group of investigators such as this would need! How fortuitous! It's a hallmark of lazy writing is what it really is, but who's splitting hairs.

To add insult to injury, the show is brimming with self-righteous aggrandizing that had me shaking my head. I couldn't unfurl my disdain brow for like a hour afterward. Team member Earnestness and Rainbows was forced to shoulder most of the platitudes and pablum. I was actually embarrassed for her as an actress and even for the character--whom I cared about not a bit. “What’s the first thing that happened when you’re brought into this world?” she asks Team member New Guy. “You get a name," is the obvious response. Well, apparently Earnest Sunshine is afraid no one is coming to her funeral because she offers the banal truism, “I’d want the world to remember that I was here, that I did things, that I affected people.” Well, kitten, I'm not sure that's the case... In her real life, she works in an office doing nothing of value, so I see where the writers were going with that, but it really fell flat for me. All I kept thinking of were those people who wish they could attend their own funerals to see just how loved they were. As though you can quantify the value of a life by how many people remember who you were. Ugh. In her defense, Slater himself gets the final tear-filled insight at the girl's funeral as the mother of the victim asks if the people who found her daughter are here. He poignantly (and predictably) responds, "They're everywhere." Oooh, that's deep! And cheesy! It's a Chicago style pizza is what it is... Heh, the show is set in Chicago... That just made my day. :)

Anyway, the rag-tag group of ordinary heroes crisscrosses the standard crime procedural landscape trying to figure out who "Highway Jane" is, working their way through three "red herring" blanks (two of which they lazily filled in with "ex-boyfriend") a "goose chase" blank they filled in with "false identity" and ambled their way to the end where, wouldn't you know it? It's the person we least expect! Huzahh! I'm SO getting an A on this assignment! Yeah, not so fast, writing staff... Turns out, the girl who ultimately turns out to be the killer is the girl who allowed the forgotten network to identify her in the first place. Okay, I know teenagers are stupid, but why exactly did she help them out in the first place? Who knows, but more importantly, who cares.

This pilot was pretty much a train wreck from minute one and never really found its footing. As far as your standard crime procedural goes, it filled in all the blanks, but made little to no effort to blaze its own trail, turn the genre on its ear, or reinvent a tired routine. The only real innovation is that apparently everyone in the world of The Forgotten is assumed to be telling the truth. Seriously, when one of the red herring ex-boyfriends is being interrogated by the police, he tells them he didn't do it and that he hasn't seen her in months and the detective just looks over her shoulder at Slater with a look of, "Well, that was a dead end... What do we do now?" Because the killer wouldn't have any reason to lie, you know. Indeed, when Slater confronts the actual killer, he rather incredulously notes that she lied to him. Well no shit, Sherlock. Of course she lied to you. Of course that goes against any sound reasoning for her coming forward in the first place, but coming up with something logical would have taken way too much effort, apparently.

At the end of the day, this was your typical crime procedural only schmaltzier. Every aspect was formulaic, thoroughly unoriginal, and predictable (I literally guessed that the victim would be from a small town in Iowa and sure enough, I was dead on). Even if you're a huge fan of crime procedurals, I'd recommend you pass on this derivative mess. It could be that I've seen this show just way too many times to be interested, but I found this pilot to be unwaveringly dull, lazy, and hackneyed from start to finish. I found myself wishing the show focused on one of the day jobs of the team members, because yes, I'd rather sit through an office staff meeting with team member Sunshine than continue to watch the same character cliches solve the same crimes over and over again. What can I say? Staff meetings are shorter and just might have cookies involved. I think we have a winner.

In short? Show FAIL.

Pilot Grade: F

Monday, September 21, 2009

Project RUNAWAY!

And here I thought drug problems, rehab, weight gain, and public ridicule would be the worst things to happen to Mischa Barton's career...
Okay, so that's being a bit dramatic, but her new pet project The Beautiful Life (sorry, The Beautiful Life: TBL (because the producers of this show actually thought it would be a big hit and warrant a hip three letter nickname--so why not build it right in?!)) isn't going to lead to the comeback I know she was hoping for. Along with brutally low ratings (even by CW standards), the quality of the show isn't enough to make it critically acclaimed (not by a long shot) and it isn't unique enough (yeah, yeah, technically "unique" is an absolute, but you know what I mean) to make it buzz worthy. As such, I don't think there's anything that could improve the ratings in the long run or create enough of a splash to get people's attention. All told, I don't see this turkey surviving very long, and quite frankly won't be too broken up inside to see it go.

I honestly wasn't even going to mention anything about this show, but what can I say? Boredom leads to poor life choices. Which, I suppose by that logic, the crew behind The Beautiful Life must have been positively overflowing with ennui...

The show follows the lives of a bunch of models who do a bunch of modeling and all live in a model house in Model York. Now, I enjoy modeling/fashion shows as much as the next person, but they aren't really a demographic known for its depth and complexity (models can't be too heavy with anything it seems, even knowledge). I think the fact that I've been known to watch Project Runway, America's Next Top Model (which, can I just say? Every time I think Tyra can't get more ridiculous, she raises that crazy ass bar another peg), Make Me a Supermodel, etc may have made me a bit harsher on this show than is really warranted. It made all the little things stand out as ridiculous that I probably wouldn't have noticed otherwise.

You know, like the fact that half the people playing models couldn't be actual models in a million billion years. So many of them were short, unexceptional, bad walkers that it put a real strain on my suspension of disbelief. Case in point, the new boy in town, Chris (or something) who gets spotted in a fancy restaurant by a modeling scout. Yeah, not so much... Aside from being way too short, he struck me as WAY too catalog. Not a bad looking guy, but he didn't strike me as anything worth writing home about. The girl who plays Raina, the new modeling phenom (and immediate love interest for Chris) at least has an interesting look. She can't walk worth a damn (seriously), but she was one of the few who really looked like she could be a model (you know, scarecrow thin and kind of peculiar looking--I'm not sure how society decided that was the measure of beauty, but whatever).

Chris is a country bumpkin visiting the big scary city with the cast of Green Acres (read: his family). In case you weren't sure of how very "from Iowa" they were, (and I have to echo Lindsay's comments here), the father actually said, "We'll be paying for this vacation for the next three harvests!" I had read Lindsay's review before I finally got around to seeing the pilot and I still couldn't believe he actually said that. And that he somehow wasn't joking. Get that man an Emmy award, because I was sure there was no possible way to say that with a straight face. Wow. Anyway, poor innocent little Chris gets sucked into the big bad world of modeling, blah, blah, blah, I already don't care.

The models who are already living in the modeling world don't interest me much either. Some girl named Marissa (oh yes, they did that thing where they name a character the same name as another character's old character so that you can't call her that anymore) who looks like Lindsey Price's little sister is all bitchy and flighty, and there's a drug dealer who couldn't tell that some girl was a cop even though I certainly could, and then there's that kid from High School Musical, which obviously didn't help matters... It's a mixed bag of crap, really. Squicky sidenote? The sight of Mr. High School Musical making out with Lyla from Dexter (yet another ingredient that couldn't help matters) was such a spectacularly disturbing and incomprehensible collision of horrible that I have to assume my seat in Hell would be just like this... watching that... "Bleck" doesn't quite do it justice...

Anyway, this cast of largely boring characters stomp and bounce and scurry and flounce their ways (seriously, the walks were laugh out loud funny) through a ridiculous runway show that the executive producers (read Ashton Kutcher) of TBL (a term I use out of shortness, not hipness) hope will highlight the frenetic energy and glamour and intrigue of the backstage happenings... or whatever. It was the most ludicrous runway show I think I've ever seen. Aside from none of these people being very model-y, since when is the signature look presented after all the girls have come back out in a line at the end of the show? I'm no expert, but the signature look is usually just the last dress to come down the runway and then all the girls come out with the designer at the very end. Again, maybe I'm just not as well versed in this as I should be, but I have never seen a show where the girl in the signature look just goes to the end of the runway and stands there like an idiot. Not that standing there playing with rose petals isn't... um... moving? or anything, but... yeah... Bad, bad, bad.

So we're this far into a review and I still haven't mentioned Mischa's role in the show... that should probably tell you something... She plays a model who basically threw her career away so that she could sneak off and have a baby or something. Again, I already don't care. Given as much care as she put into going off grid in order to keep the pregnancy a secret, maybe she shouldn't have a picture of herself holding her baby as the wallpaper on her cell phone! Oy... Saddest part of all? I'm pretty sure Mischa was the best part of the show. Ouch.

Overall, this was a dud (just in case the subtle tone of this post so far was too subdued for you). A bunch of boring people leading boring lives. The worst part is that the show tries so hard to convince you that these are, in fact, extremely interesting people leading fabulous lives... I'm not convinced. Some of the clothes were kind of interesting, but even then, if I want to see fabulous clothes, I'd rather they be modeled by characters that I actually care about (enter Gossip Girl, stage left--seriously, how fabulous is that white suit?). Gossip Girl is basically one big fashion show, but it's woven into the characters in a way that the clothes actually inform on the character. It makes it all a lot more interesting than pretty much anything TBL has to offer. I actually found myself feeling embarrassed for the actors who got suckered into this mess...

Long story short, I won't be giving this one even a second episode's worth of a chance. The pilot was pretty bad (although, I think I liked it better than Melrose Place... what with the lack of Ashlee Simpson and all... wow...) and it's in a mercilessly crowded timeslot on Wednesdays, so I'm cutting my losses.

Speaking of cutting losses, the second episode of Melrose Place was even worse than the first. I spent the better part of the episode alternately cringing and fast-forwarding. The only reason I gave it a second week was because I had heard episode two would be much better... It was not. Ashlee is Sydney's long lost daughter! It's only the second week and the shark? It hath been jumped... several dozen times.

Rounding out the CW trifecta of mediocrity, The Vampire Diaries isn't great, but so long as Ian Somerhalder gets more screen time, I suppose I can excuse the angsty teen relationship crap. Seriously, he's as evil as he is pretty. Don't mind if I do! Other than him, though? Meh... Best worst line from episode two? "We met, and we talked, and it was epic, but then the sun came up and reality set in.” Epic? Really? Ha! I'd be more critical, but leave it to a teenager to think that talking for a few hours falls into "epic" territory. Oy. (They keep using that word. I don'na think it means what they think it means...)

Pilot Grade: F

Friday, September 11, 2009

All Vampired Out

Tapping into the vampiric pop culture zeitgeist of the past few years, the CW unveiled it's latest new series in hopes of capitalizing on the trend. And, although The Vampire Diaries was better than expected (what with the bar being shockingly low and all), its debut arrived to this party pretty late and I think I might be a little vamped out... Apparently I'm the only one though, because the pilot premiered to record ratings for the CW. It was infinitely better than Melrose Place, however, so it's nice to see it trounce such inferior network compatriots (Melrose premiered to fairly disappointing ratings--particularly for a series premiere. Heh--take that, Ashlee Simpson. And no, I don't know exactly where the hostility comes from, but it's there... oooh, is it there.)

I began watching the pilot with a sizable helping of blasé toward the surfeit of vampire-based media that's currently on the market, but it turned out better than expected. Sure, the first three quarters of the pilot were rife with all the angsty teen stereotypes you'd expect and all the brooding vampire clichés that have proven so pervasive to the genre, but then Ian Somerhalder showed up. What I was ready and willing to write off as just another hackneyed, so-so pilot suddenly got a hell of a lot more interesting. I wouldn't say he turned the pilot to gold or anything (there's only so much alchemy one actor can perform), but he did manage to catch my attention and was just enough to commit me to a few more episodes.

In much the same vein (no pun intended) as Twilight, The Vampire Diaries follows a melancholic teenage girl as she falls for the mysterious vampire in town. The books that inspired The Vampire Diaries actually came out well before Twilight (or True Blood, for that matter) so to call it derivative wouldn't be exactly accurate, but it's an unavoidable notion. To The Vampire Diaries' credit, I could tell is was better than Twilight within minutes, although that's not saying much. (AND, with the CW holding the cards instead of Stephanie Meyer, these crazy kids might just get some sexy time before, you know... they get married at the age of 18... Ugh.) (Quick sidenote on Twilight: I got together with some friends to mock the movie as a team and while I wasn't surprised at its craptacularity, I was a bit surprised at just how BORING it was. I mean, the books were poorly conceived and even more poorly written, but they at least held my attention for more than five minutes at a time. Maybe it was Kristen Stewart's soporific acting, maybe it was the poor casting choices all around, maybe it was Stephanie Meyer's self-indulgent (and beyond tacky) cameo, maybe it was everything, but I barely made it through that turkey awake. And I am not the kind of person who falls asleep during movies. (Annie has already cornered the market in that regard, so who am I to steal her thunder?)) Back to the point, The Vampire Diaries appears to be better than Twilight in every incarnation, so it's a shame that the TV series was developed after the fact. Although, it probably wouldn't have been developed in the first place if Twilight hadn't proliferated, so The Vampire Diaries owes it a debt and a grudge all at once. So, in deference to The Vampire Diaries, I'll try to keep the comparisons to a minimum from here on out, but it ain't gonna be easy...

The show centers around Elena, a small town girl who has lost both of her parents and now lives with her little brother and aunt (whom Elena very informatively calls "Aunt" every time she talks to her--thanks, Exposition Fairy!). Trying to get her life back on track, she finds herself alienated from her friends and family and is instantly drawn to the new guy in town, a vampire named... what was his name? Holy hell, I remember that the last name was "Salvatore," (because that's important) but the first name is totally gone... Umm... Stephan! It was Stephan. (I pretend it just came to me, but no, I had to check IMDb.) Like I said, things don't get interesting till Ian Somerhalder's character Damon shows up, so I was only mostly paying attention until then. Anyway, the structural conceit of the show (which I assume was born of the novels) is that Elena and Stephan both poor their hearts into their diaries and wax poetic (cheesy teen poetic) about life and death and whatever. While it made for a fairly straightforward structure to the episode, I've grown sick of voice overs. They can be awesome and rather necessary to a series, but lately, ever show on the block has some would-be philosophizer narrating a bunch of crap that the audience is currently watching on screen. It takes all the subtlety out of a performance and generally assumes the audience is too stupid to pick up on things. It wasn't unbearable in The Vampire Diaries, and I acknowledge that it's the basis for the show, but I have to assume it worked better in the books than it does on screen.

In a refreshing turn after suffering through Twilight's ridiculous mythology, the rules applied to vampires and their behavior in The Vampire Diaries is largely traditional. While Stephanie Meyer threw the entire book out the window when creating her sparkly universe, here we have the same modern context, but all the old rules still apply. These vampires must be invited into a residence before entering (one of the best and most interesting restrictions), they can fly, they're followed around by crows/ravens, they totally butcher people (even reformed Stephan slips up now and again), and they can't go out in the sun (at least not without their magical rings in tow). Okay, that last bit sounds lame, but I come from the school of Buffy and Angel, so I just assume their rings are akin to the Gem of Amarra and am willing to let it go. It was much less tacky than it sounds, I promise. In less conventional fare, they also seem to control the fog (apparently there was a half-price sale on smoke machines or something) and have Jedi mind tricks. With all the traditional aspects in place, I was willing to be forgiving for taking liberties elsewhere. The reason that this is important is that it gives weight and gravity to character decisions and actions. In the Twilight universe, vampires are basically indestructible. As with Superman, that makes for fairly boring confrontations and inconsequential decisions. I much prefer limits and restrictions on abilities and behaviors. It makes the writers try a whole lot harder and makes the characters a lot more interesting when they have to work around their own limitations. In that sense, kudos, show.

Anyway, the show ambled along in typical teenage fashion for the better part of the pilot. The actors were alright and they did a pretty good job, but no one really stood out (for good reasons or bad--except for Somerhalder). The pilot was based pretty directly on the books (or so I've heard) and follows a fairly well-thought-out, though predictable storyline. The actress playing Elena does a decent enough job, but the vulnerable ingénue gig is seriously overdone these days, so she got on my nerves a bit by association. She didn't seem totally useless or completely ditzy though, so I think the writers could make something out of her. Stephan is equally middle-of-the-road, but I must say his Cro-Magnon brow brought back some Angelic memories for me. The supporting cast supports suitably, and the acting for the most part was competent, if not all that engaging. They were likable, however, and I could see where there might grow on me over time. The directing didn't strike me as anything terribly innovative, but the production value is solid and the setting and effects held up against the industry standard at the moment. With that kind of "meh" flying around, I was fairly ready to call it a day, but then Ian Somerhalder (who played Boone Carlyle on Lost) showed up and I was happily forced to pay attention.

Not that it comes as any great surprise that he made for the best part of the pilot, but he somehow managed to bring something fresh to an old routine. Aside from being decidedly easy to look at, he bucked the trend of mopey, brooding, humorless vampires and instead imbued the role with impish zeal and mirth. In a manner that smacked of Spike (circa Buffy season 2), Somerhalder's character Damon was lively and menacing in a delightful "I'm going to screw with your head just because I can" kind of way. He seems to take quite a lot of pleasure in pestering Stephan (who is apparently his little brother--nice) and shows up with little more agenda than to have fun raising hell. It was a nice change of pace and is the primary reason I'll be giving the show a few more weeks to really suck me in (again, pun-avoidance just isn't easy when it comes to this subject matter, so bear with me). I don't know what all he has planned, but he piqued my interest just enough to want to find out.

Clearly The Vampire Diaries isn't going to be a dramatic tour de force and it certainly can't hold a candle to forerunners like Buffy and Angel, but the pilot was watchable, if not all that original. I could see where this show could find its way into "guilty pleasure" territory and in spite of my jaded feelings toward vampires at the moment, this seems to be a pretty guilty romp that has some commitment potential (although the pilot in and of itself did little to sell me on more than an episode to episode trial run). I don't think it'll ever break into the top tier or anything, but with Somerhalder on board, I'm invested enough to give it a shot.

Pilot Grade:
without Somerhalder? D
with Somerhalder? C-

Wednesday, September 9, 2009

Clue: The Hot Urban Singles Edition

Ohhh, CW. Here we go again. Melrose Place? Really...?

Not that your last 90s reboot wasn't a rollicking success, but... oh, wait.

Nevermind.

First off, I must admit that my knowledge of the original version is cursory at best. I seem to vaguely recall catching an episode here or there, but most of my familiarity with the show was born of I Love the 90s, so you'll just have to bear with me. I came into this show pretty well blind (even blinder than with the 90210 reboot). But, based on how spectacularly awful the 90210 reboot turned out, I couldn't help but going into this one with more than a little apprehension and a smidge of "ready, willing, and eager to hate it." Oh wait, did I mention that Ashlee Simpson is on board? Make that a heaping bowlful... then double it.

With all biases and ignorances out of the way, here we go.

The reboot starts off with a bunch of quick cuts of LA, the party circuit, night clubs, restaurants, and lurid activity, all spliced together under the soundtrack of Kevin Rudolf's Let It Burn. You know, so the producers of the show can set the proper tone for a network whose only demographic is teenage girls all within the first 10 seconds of the show. The soundtrack may have been my first quibble with the show, but it somehow managed to be my 4th, 7th, 11th, and 19th quibbles as well. Whenever a show uses music that doesn't really add anything to a scene but was clearly included because it's hip and cool or whatever, my brother and I will say [in requisite cool-hipster-with-popped-shirt-collar voiceover voice], "Tonight's episode featured music by..." as a way to hang a lantern on the cross-promotional crap that has become so pervasive these days. If I had said this every time it was painfully apparent during last night's pilot, I would have missed so much dialogue the episode wouldn't have made any sense... which, come to think of it, is where I ended up anyway...

Anyway, lousy, contractually-obligated soundtrack aside (which isn't easy because there must have been at least 30 different songs sampled in only 42 minutes of programming), the show really didn't have a whole lot to offer. That said, I acknowledge the fact that it's a soap, they know it's a soap, the audience knows it, and no one is kidding themselves into thinking it's anything else. I tend to be more forgiving when writers and producers have a clear objective (no matter how cheesy or tacky or bad (oh my!)) and stick to it. Nothing is more annoying than when a show like this is trying to convince people that it's a hard-hitting drama that really delves deep into the psychology of today's youth, blah, blah, blah. It's a soapy show with lots of skin and they're comfortable with that. Even if I'm a little bored by it...

Much like the original, this reboot focuses on a bunch of twenty-somethings who all live in the same building complex which is landladied by Sydney, who was an original series cast-member (and who looks freaking fantastic for her age--seriously, I had a hard time telling if she was a member of the new class or not). The pilot did its damnedest to try to showcase each character in a way that would really endear him/her to the audience and give some depth and backstory, but when the bitchy blonde 22-year old hot-shot publicist who takes no prisoners and always gets what she wants is one of the more interesting cliché--I, uh, mean... characters, you know you're in trouble. Not only did I not really care about most of the characters, but I had a hell of a time believing that any of these people would be friends (even though the show would have you believe that merely living in the same complex means you're kindred spirits) or that matriarch Sydney would somehow be the glue that brought all these kiddies together. [SPOILER ALERT--not that you should really care] So bearing that in mind, when Sydney winds up dead in the courtyard pool, I wasn't exactly heartbroken and couldn't really believe that anyone else was either.

So just in case the suds and skin weren't enough, at least you've got MURRRRDERRR. A murder most foul! Or whatever. She's found dead as a dead dead pretty quick and the rest of the pilot tries to set up possible culprits and other even less interesting characters to fill out the cast. Along with Ella's bitchy publicist stock character, Melrose Place features a whole lot of the same kinds of people you'd expect to see in a whole bunch of the same situations. I didn't watch much of the original, but I'm guessing these characters are even more hackneyed if you were a fan back in the day...

I don't want to belabor the cast list, because really, who cares, but here are some highlights. Jonah (which I keep spelling Johan for some reason) is an aspiring filmmaker who proposes to his girlfriend Riley just seconds before the body is found in the pool. Any rational person would think, "Huh, well that sure killed the mood," but Jonah just gets all huffy that Riley won't give him an answer. Because really, who doesn't want to have to answer the question, "So, when did you two lovebirds get engaged?" with "Oh, you know, the day Sydney was found face down in the pool with streaks of blood emanating from her vicious knife wound." Misty, watercolor, memmmmmries... Anyway, he's lucky he's got blackmail on his side when it comes to his career as a struggling artist because if his birthday videos are any indication, he royally sucks at his craft. Although, props to Jonah for trying to get out of his latest party videographer gig by using everyone's obvious excuse of "my landlord died." Who knew you got comp time for dead landlords? And here I thought it was only first-degree relatives... Quick insight into his girlfriend Riley? She spends the better part of the pilot whining that she wishes Jonah be a "grown-up," not recognizing the fact that adults don't call themselves "grown-ups" in the first place. Charming.

Adding to the already exhaustively motley crew, we have a pair of resident badboys, including David, who, as it turns out, gets all of his money from his part time gig as an art thief. No, I'm not kidding. I actually laughed out loud. We also have a stoic, but soft-hearted chef named... Auggie... Again, not kidding. Here's hoping for his sake they start calling him August. Or Gus. Or... Steve.

To round out the tarts, we have struggling med student Lauren, who starts moonlighting as a hooker after a date goes (rather inexplicably) into Indecent Proposal territory before the salad even makes it to the table and Ashlee Simpson, who plays the doe-eyed new girl with something to hide. I realize her character Violet is supposed to be acting like a good girl, but as near as I can tell, both Ashlee and her alter-ego suck at acting. She was literally in about 2 and a half minutes of the pilot... and that was more than enough. [Sidenote? Her plastic surgery made her look plastic alright...]

With a cast a characters like that, how could it not be scandalous and utterly awesome and stuff...?

The pilot sets up several of these people as possible suspects in Sydney's murder and tries to present these people as long-time friends, but in spite of the supposed cohesion, the pilot felt all over the place. The storylines should have been organically intertwined, but each character's story felt totally disparate for everyone else's (especially Dr. Hooker-with-a-heart-of-gold who didn't seem to fit in anywhere at all). The concept and writing were pretty typically soapy, but where the first season of Dirty Sexy Money took a weak genre and made it stylized and engaging, Melrose Place just takes the genre and gives it a new soundtrack.

The bare bones should be soap opera gold, but it just didn't really work. The directing job on the pilot definitely didn't help. By half way through, I was seriously starting to think that it must have been directed by Johan (geez, JONAH, what is my problem? Maybe my subconscious is telling me that making him Dutch would have helped...). It was cheesy and juvenile and overall just plain bad. The flashbacks were embarrassing, the blocking was clunky, the pacing was ridiculous, and the final montage of reveals and intrigue was just lame. If that's a harbinger of things to come regarding style and structure, I'm not sure even a whole new team of writers could help this turkey.

Okay, "turkey" may be a bit harsh, even if it's accurate. When taking this show for what it is, a soap opera aimed at teenagers, it wasn't anywhere near as awful as it could have been. It was better than the 90210 pilot, although that's not saying much. For the most part the cast was competent (if not exactly good) and the pilot at least tried to make sense and set up some intrigue and mystery for the future. Not that the audience cared enough about Sydney (after even less screen time than Ashlee) to really mind that she was killed off or really be concerned with who killed her, but at least they tried, right? Right?? No? Oh, well.

I suppose after a few episodes (and assuming they manage to make any of these characters actually interesting) this show could conceivably turn into a guilty pleasure, but I'm not invested enough at the moment to give it that much time or attention. It's in a pretty uncrowded timeslot, but even then, I've already got enough guilty pleasures to fill my quota, and quite frankly, they're higher on the "pleasure" than they are on the "guilt," unlike Melrose Place...

Bottom line? Stick with Gossip Girl, because really, just about anyone who would give this show a chance is already a GG fan. My favorite crew of the Upper East Side has all the sex, lies, and intrigue of Melrose, only, you know... with better writing, acting, directing, and costume design.

So you can see where it's a really close call between the two...

Pilot Grade: F

Tuesday, September 8, 2009

Conflict Negotiations

Now that TV is accessible through more than one avenue (god bless you, DVR and internet), figuring out what to watch everything (and how) should be easier, but in the end, all it does it make things more complicated as you can easily fit more shows into any given schedule. Back in the day, I had more than a few Sophie's Choice moments when deciding what to watch (Veronica Mars is the reason I never got hooked on Lost), but now I can catch everything I care about with room to spare most nights. There are still a few log-jams to navigate, however, so it's looking like Monday night might just see a resurgence of the old TV I have in my bedroom to catch the overflow... Awwh, that takes me back...

Anyway, here's a breakdown of what conflicts with what. If you're partial to a grid presentation, here you go. I don't know why, but that just isn't as easy for me to read... The times listed are Mountain Standard Time (assuming I didn't screw up anywhere), so adjust as needed for peeps outside my region.

Good luck! And may the DVR be with you...

SUNDAY


7:00 PM
  • Extreme Makeover: Home Edition

  • The Amazing Race

  • The Simpsons/ The Cleveland Show

8:00 PM

  • Desperate Housewives

  • Three Rivers

  • Family Guy/ American Dad

  • Dexter

9:00 PM

  • Brothers & Sisters

  • Cold Case

  • Mad Men


MONDAY


7:00 PM

  • How I Met Your Mother/Accidentally On Purpose

  • House

  • Dancing with the Stars (1st half)

  • One Tree Hill

  • Heroes

8:00 PM

  • Gossip Girl

  • Lie to Me

  • Trauma

  • Two and a Half Men/The Big Bang Theory

  • Dancing with the Stars (2nd half)

9:00 PM

  • Castle

  • CSI: Miami


TUESDAY


7:00 PM

  • V

  • NCIS

  • 90210

  • Hell's Kitchen

  • The Biggest Loser (1st half)

8:00 PM

  • Dancing with the Stars (results show)

  • NCIS: Los Angeles

  • Melrose Place

  • So You Think You Can Dance (I think... the schedule for this show is schizophrenic at best)

  • The Biggest Loser (2nd half)

9:00 PM

  • The Good Wife

  • The Forgotten


WEDNESDAY

7:00 PM

  • So You Think You Can Dance (again, schizophrenic...)

  • Mercy

  • Hank/ The Middle

  • New Adventures of Old Christine/ Gary Unmarried

  • America's Next Top Model

8:00 PM

  • Glee

  • Modern Family/ Cougar Town

  • Criminal Minds

  • The Beautiful Life

  • Law & Order: SVU

9:00 PM

  • Eastwick

  • CSI: NY


THURSDAY


7:00 PM

  • Flash Forward

  • The Vampire Diaries

  • Bones

  • Survivor

  • Weekend Update/ Parks and Recreation

8:00 PM

  • Fringe

  • CSI

  • Supernatural

  • Grey's Anatomy

  • The Office/ Community

9:00 PM

  • Private Practice

  • The Mentalist


FRIDAY


7:00 PM

  • Supernanny

  • Ghost Whisperer

  • Smallville

  • Brothers/ Til Death

  • Law & Order

8:00 PM

  • Dollhouse

  • Southland

  • Ugly Betty

  • Medium

  • America's Next Top Model (repeats)

  • Monk

9:00 PM

  • Numb3rs

  • White Collar (but not till October)

Wednesday, September 2, 2009

September: A blessing, wrapped in a dream, inside a paradise...

Hey peeps. That blessed, beyond blessed of months is finally upon us. I should love September because my birthday is in September, but alas, I hate my birthday, but adore all the other trappings that come at roughly the same time.

In other news, I just finished watching a wonderful two-part special on the History (International?) channel called Russia: Land of the Tsars (hence the vaguely Churchill-ish title to the blog). It sounds like it would be insanely boring, but it was actually quite fascinating. It gave me an insight into Milana's Russian justice at any rate. :) Also, it was narrated by Edward Herrmann (aka papa Gilmore), so that was just icing on the cake. It's not the kind of show I generally recommend on this blog, but it's the kind of show that eats up a ridiculous amount of my viewing time. Both entertaining and informative. Highly recommended.

Anyway, in TV news that you might actually care about, premiere season is finally upon us. The way things are stacking up, I might just have to take the fourth week of September off work...

Here's what the schedule is looking like, day by day. (Bear in mind, I don't list stupid crap like Are You Smarter than a Fifth Grader? and whatnot on my lists, so if you're into that kind of thing, you're on your own. I only include quality programming like, uh, you know... Melrose Place... on my list... Okay, it's completely arbitrary--just go with it. I've listed pretty much all new series premieres, whether they have any potential or not...)

Also, I'm not sure what time zone the showtimes are based on, so check your local listings. And bear in mind that premiere dates are subject to change...

SEPTEMBER:

Tuesday, Sept. 8
  • 90210, 8 p.m. (CW)
    (Skip it--it's awful)
  • Melrose Place, 9 p.m. (CW)
    (Skip it--it will be awful)
  • Sons of Anarchy, 10 p.m. (FX)
    (See it? I don't watch, but I hear it's excellent)

Wednesday, Sept. 9

  • America's Next Top Model, 8 p.m. (CW)
    (DVR it--it's the shortie edition, so at least something is different, but you'll still want to fast forward through most of it)
  • Glee, 9 p.m. (Fox)
    (See it, definitely--I loved the pilot last Spring and hear it only gets better from there)
  • So You Think You Can Dance, 8 p.m. (Fox)
    (See it--I don't know a damn thing about dance and yet, I totally enjoy the show.)

Thursday, Sept. 10

  • Supernatural, 9 p.m. (CW)
    (Skip it--I don't watch it, but I hear it's getting long in the tooth)
  • The Vampire Diaries, 8 p.m. (CW)
    (DVR it--I've heard it's not as bad as you'd guess, but I think we've all had our fill of vampires these days...)

Monday, Sept. 14

  • Gossip Girl, 9 p.m. (CW)
    (See it--I can't wait to see what craziness next season has in store-- Yay!)
  • The Jay Leno Show, 10 p.m. (NBC)
    (Skip it--Leno wasn't funny then and he won't be funny now--I hope he gets trounced by the scripted programming opposite his dog and pony show, but sadly, I doubt it'll happen.)
  • Lincoln Heights, 8 p.m. (ABC Family)
    (Skip it--never seen it, never hope to)
  • One Tree Hill, 8 p.m. (CW)
    (SKIP IT--caps lock really speaks for itself, but if you thought the show was bad before (and it was), imagine half the leads have left the show--and there you have next season)

Tuesday, Sept. 15

  • The Biggest Loser, 8 p.m. (NBC)
    (DVR it, if you must--this show has more time wasting and filler than almost any other reality show. I don't watch the show regularly (by any stretch), but if there's nothing else, a fast-forwarded version is palatable.)

Wednesday, Sept. 16

  • The Beautiful Life, 9 p.m. (CW)
    (DVR it--contrary to Mischa Barton's press lately, I've actually heard this one isn't half bad. I'm as shocked as you are.)

Thursday, Sept. 17

  • Bones, 8 p.m. (Fox)
    (DVR it, if you must--this show has never been great, and the last couple of seasons have been downright bad, but I've heard they're going to try to improve things in the coming season. I'll give it a another shot... maybe...)
  • Community, 9:30 p.m. (NBC)
    (See it--one of the most promising pilots of the fall)
  • Fringe, 9 p.m. (Fox)
    (See it--sadly, I fell off the wagon with this one, but I've heard the end of last season really knocked it out of the park. I might just have to give this sucker another chance...)
  • It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia, 10 p.m. (FX)
    (See it--I've always been meaning to put this show on my rotation, but it just never happens. I hear it's great though.)
  • The Office, 9 p.m. (NBC)
    (DVR it--it's a very crowded timeslot and this show was hit or miss at best last season. I'm hoping they turn things around, but there's nothing quite like a wedding and a baby to ruin a show...)
  • Parks and Recreation, 8:30 p.m. (NBC)
    (DVR it, if at all--I've heard promises that this season will be better, so I'll give it another shot.)
  • Survivor: Samoa, 8 p.m. (CBS)
    (Skip it. That is all.)

Sunday, Sept. 20

  • Curb Your Enthusiasm, 9 p.m. (HBO)
    (DVR it--I hear it's excellent, but alas, I don't have HBO...)
  • Bored to Death, 9:30 p.m. (HBO)
    (Skip it-- I'm not hearing good things so far...)

Monday, Sept. 21

  • Accidentally on Purpose, 8:30 p.m. (CBS)
    (SKIP IT--wow, awful.)
  • The Big Bang Theory, 9:30 p.m. (CBS)
    (DVR it--it'll never be a first tier show, but it has its moments, if there's nothing else on.)
  • Castle, 10 p.m. (ABC)
    (See it--Nathan Fillion? Being smarmy and goofy? Yes, please.)
  • CSI: Miami, 10 p.m. (CBS)
    (Skip it--Skip it good.)
  • Dancing With the Stars, 8 p.m. (ABC)
    (Skip it--I hate this show for oh-so-many-reasons, but most of all because it gives dancing shows a bad name. If you want to see actual dancing, SYTYCD is second to none.)
  • Heroes, 8 p.m. (NBC)
    (Skip it, or catch it online if you're morbidly curious to see if they can actually resurrect this ignominious failure.)
  • House, 8 p.m. (Fox)
    (DVR it-- word is the new season is looking pretty awesome, but after last season's let down and my overall boredom with the concept after all these years, I'm keeping open the option to break up with this one...)
  • How I Met Your Mother, 8 p.m. (CBS)
    (See it--Barney Stinson. 'Nough said.)
  • Two and a Half Men, 9 p.m. (CBS)
    (SKIP IT--seriously, don't help this craptastic show succeed anymore, people. It's not good. At all.)

Tuesday, Sept. 22

  • The Forgotten, 10 p.m. (ABC)
    (DVR it-- this one is being completely re-tooled, but it still doesn't look like it has much potential. Exhibit A? Christian Slater...)
  • The Good Wife, 10 p.m. (CBS)
    (See it--it looks to be one of the most promising new dramas of the fall and one of only a few legal dramas currently on the air. I hear it starts off a little slow, but hopefully it'll get the ball rolling quickly.)
  • NCIS, 8 p.m. (CBS)
    (SKIP IT-- another bad show with awesome ratings. Stop rewarding crappiness! It's not even the kind of show that's so bad it's good. It's just bad.)
  • NCIS: Los Angeles, 9 p.m. (CBS)
    (Skip it-- see previous rant, move to west coast)

Wednesday, Sept. 23

  • Cougar Town, 9:30 p.m. (ABC)
    (DVR it--as much as I hate to say it, I've heard this one is actually pretty good. I'll have to see it to believe it, but I'll at least give it a shot.)
  • Criminal Minds, 9 p.m. (CBS)
    (Skip it--if you've seen one crime procedural, you've seen 'em all.)
  • CSI: NY, 10 p.m. (CBS)
    (Skip it--although, if you're going to watch a CSI, you could do worse... Miami, I'm looking in your direction.)
  • Eastwick, 10 p.m. (ABC)
    (Skip it--I've heard it's not as awful as it could be, but still not worth your time. I'll pass.)
  • Gary Unmarried, 8:30 p.m. (CBS)
    (Skip it--I'm not even sure what this one is about, but I'm quite certain I'm okay with that.)
  • Law & Order: Special Victims Unit, 9 p.m. (NBC)
    (Skip it--unless you're into that kind of show... even then, your DVR is more than sufficient.)
  • Mercy, 8 p.m. (NBC)
    (Skip it--unless you want something to mock. It's gonna be bad, peeps. If you want to see a show about nurses that doesn't suck, Nurse Jackie is really your only bet. And no, HawthoRNe isn't a viable option either.)
  • Modern Family, 9 p.m. (ABC)
    (See it--one of the funniest previews I've seen for a new show. Definitely worth giving a shot.)
  • The New Adventures of Old Christine, 8 p.m. (CBS)
    (Skip it--meh.)

Thursday, Sept. 24

  • CSI: Crime Scene Investigation, 9 p.m. (CBS)
    (DVR it, if you must--I hear Jorja is coming back, so that could be interesting, but other than that, this old dog needs to be put down.)
  • Flash Forward, 8 p.m. (ABC)
    (See it--it sounds like this one has a lot of potential. I'm not sold yet, but it's got decent bones to work with and a solid concept.)
  • Grey's Anatomy, 9 p.m. (ABC)
    (Skip it--if you thought last season was soul-crushingly painful to watch, I hear the next season is going to be even worse, er, uh, "powerful," as the powers to be like to call it.)
  • The Mentalist, 10 p.m. (CBS)
    (Skip it--this show could have been good, but the writers simply can't be bothered to actually write. This show got worse episode to episode, so I assume season to season will take an even greater toll.)

Friday, Sept. 25

  • Brothers, 8 p.m. (Fox)
    (Skip it--not hearing good things...)
  • Dollhouse, 9 p.m. (Fox)
    (See it--the little Whedon show that could is back (miraculously) and if Epitaph One is any indication of things to come, next season is gonna rock. Plus, the entire Whedonverse (and a good portion of the BSG-verse) have signed on to guest star, so I'm definitely in.)
  • Ghost Whisperer, 8 p.m. (CBS)
    (Skip it--"Ugh" just doesn't quite cut it...)
  • Law & Order, 8 p.m. (NBC)
    (Skip it--that's enough Law & Order. More than enough.)
  • Medium, 9 p.m. (CBS)
    (Skip it-- I wanted to like this show, but the cast is so unwaveringly unlikable that I just can't stomach it.)
  • Numb3rs, 10 p.m. (CBS)
    (DVR it--if you're into this kind of show. It's not on my list, but I hear it's all right.)
  • Smallville, 8 p.m. (CW)
    (Skip it--good lord, what is this, it's 10th season? Let. It. Die.)

Sunday, Sept. 27

  • The Amazing Race, 8 p.m. (CBS)
    (Skip it--Americans travelling the globe and making asses out of themselves and insulting other cultures? I'll pass, thanks.)
  • American Dad, 9:30 p.m. (Fox)
    (Skip it--I have no feelings on this one either way, but err on the side of not watching it.)
  • Brothers & Sisters, 10 p.m. (ABC)
    (Skip it--I don't watch this overgrown turkey and have no desires to start.)
  • The Cleveland Show, 8:30 p.m. (Fox)
    (Skip it--it's not lookin' good. At all.)
  • Cold Case, 10 p.m. (CBS)
    (Skip it--good lord, CBS, just how many murders can you fit into your schedule? 87, apparently.)
  • Desperate Housewives, 9 p.m. (ABC)
    (Skip it--this show lost all steam several seasons ago and doesn't show any signs of improvement.)
  • Dexter, 9 p.m. (Showtime)
    (See it--I'm no fan of marriage or babies, but if any show could make it work, it's Dexter. And it's looking like the Trinity Killer will strike someone we know, so maybe Rita isn't long for this world in the first place. Here's hoping. Course that would saddle Dex with the kids... Ugh.)
  • The Simpsons, 8 p.m. (Fox)
    (Skip it-- I haven't watched in nearly a decade and with good reason.)

Monday, Sept. 28

  • Lie to Me, 9 p.m. (Fox)
    (DVR it--you know, I hated this show at first, but it seemed to find its footing toward the end of the first season. It's not appointment TV, but it's not bad.)
  • Trauma, 9 p.m. (NBC)
    (Skip it--cliches, cliches, cliches. And a lot of explosions. Yeah... I'm good, thanks.)

Tuesday, Sept. 29

  • Hell's Kitchen, 8 p.m. (Fox)
    (Skip it--blah.)
  • Shark Tank, 8 p.m. (ABC)
    (Skip it--double blah).

Wednesday, Sept. 30

  • Hank, 8 p.m. (ABC)
    (Skip it--they're completely re-working this show and re-shooting the pilot, but nothing can save this mess of a show and its eye-rollingly lame concept.)
  • The Middle, 8:30 pm. (ABC)
    (Skip it--Patricia Heaton is invariably unwatchable and the thought of her as the typical harried mother of three is pretty much my worst nightmare.)

OCTOBER:

Thursday, Oct. 1

  • Private Practice, 10 p.m. (ABC)
    (DVR the premiere, the kick it to the curb--what can I say? I'm going to have to see how the ridiculous freak-show c-section turns out, but after that, I'm pretty sure I can live without this one.)

Sunday, Oct. 4

  • Three Rivers, 9 p.m. (CBS)
    (DVR the pilot, but be prepared to be disappointed... and preached at--everything I'm hearing doesn't bode well for this one, no matter how much Alex O'Laughlin it has. I've also heard it's unbearably dull and spends most of its time soap-boxing about organ donation. Um... yay?)

Friday, Oct. 9

  • Sanctuary, 10 p.m. (Syfy)
    (Skip it-- I didn't even know this one was coming back)
  • Ugly Betty, 8 p.m. (ABC)
    (Skip it-- this show is on its last legs, so you may as well break things off sooner than later. If the downturn creatively doesn't kill it, the Friday night death slot certainly will.)

Thursday, Oct. 15

  • 30 Rock, 9:30 p.m. (NBC)
    (See it-- I'll finally be able to add this one to my regular rotation this year and I'm pretty excited about it.)

Friday, Oct. 23

  • Southland, 9 p.m. (NBC)
    (DVR it-- this one didn't really impress me all that much last season, but it ended on an up note. It's a well-made show and I hear they're planning to iron out some of its flaws, so I'll keep it in mind for a rainy day (read: Saturday)).
  • White Collar, 10 p.m. (USA)
    (See it-- I'm pretty excited about this one. The more I see, the more intrigued I get. USA has a hell of a track record with this kind of show, and with Matt Bomer at the helm, it looks like we might have a winner on our hands. I think the network would have done better to have paired it with Burn Notice or Psych over the summer, but hopefully it'll find an audience amidst the fall onslaught.)

NOVEMBER:

Tuesday, Nov. 3

  • V, 8 p.m. (ABC)
    (See it-- easily the most promising and highly-anticipated new show of the season. Everything I've heard has been good, so hopefully it lives up to expectations (rather than fizzling like The Nine, which was the most lauded pilot of a few years ago and then kind of fell apart.))

Thursday, August 27, 2009

Look out, Itchy! He's Irish!

Okay, so if you haven't watched the season three mid-season finale of Burn Notice yet, I'd suggest you turn back now because this post is going to be pretty damn spoilerific. It's been a good few weeks, so I assume we're all on the same page (the same awesomely awesome page, that is).

This season of Burn Notice has been a little hit and miss for me. Mostly hit, but with a few elements of "hmmm..." thrown in here and there. While I liked the idea of the Miami police finally taking a look into the car chases, explosions, kidnappings, gun-running, sniping, escapades etc. in which Michael and his crew invariably find themselves, the Detective Paxson story arc started off a little rocky for me. I liked seeing the threat that Management made at the end of season 2 take on some real weight (what with all the protections in place that kept Michael off everyone's radar being completely removed), but I didn't think Moon Bloodgood's approach to the role (and to large extent the writers' conception of Det. Paxson) was as successful as it could have been.

Having just come off the constant flirty/threatening ways of Carla, I had hoped that Paxson would be all business, but even at her most annoyed with Michael and his antics, she was practically purring like a kitten whilst threatening to ruin his life. [Don't get me wrong, any right-minded, sane, red-blooded person would simply melt at his feet, but still...] Her portrayal was a little too coquettish to be truly threatening to Michael's operation and I just didn't see the legal walls coming down around Michael as I would have expected with the police finally taking a vested interest in his operations. That said, the story arc was by no means entirely unsuccessful, and although it didn't strike quite the right chord, it was fun enough and helped set up a season where all bets are off and Michael, Fiona, and Sam are going to have to do things a little differently from now on. Heretofore, they could do whatever they wanted with relative impunity, but now, a lot of organizations, whether legitimate, criminal, or... um... other, have their eyes on Westen and company. This development led to Michael and his cohorts being the client rather than helping a client more and more often throughout the season.

Getting rid of Management was a definite game-changer for the series. Not only does this mean that all protections are off and there's no one keeping Michael's exploits off the books, but it also spurs a necessary alteration in Michael's goals and agendas. His raison d’être for the past two seasons was to find out who burned him and why, with the desire to get his old life back a distant, seemingly unattainable fantasy. Now that Michael knows the who and the why, and for the time being, is ostensibly free of them, where does he go from there?

In spite of Fiona's hope that Michael would give up on his desire to get his old job back, with the burn notice out of the way, it's forefront in his mind. Many fans of the show have given Fi a hard time for pressing him on this issue, but I have to admit, I totally side with her on this one. Michael got screwed over on several very real, often life-threatening levels and the thought of just going back to life as he knew it seems kind of ridiculous to me. Aside from the logistical conundrum that presents, the first two seasons of the show spent considerable time developing Michael's emotional and psychological development and it's hard to imagine him turning his back on the people he cares about. The dichotomy between Michael's old life and current life really started to come into focus with the first half season 3 and I'll be very interested to see how it plays out if the second half. I can understand where he's torn on this (even if he tries to be definitive) and for someone who is accustomed to unequivocal decision-making, this must be especially difficult. He has come to appreciate the people in his life and genuinely cares about them, but at the same time, his life was a lot more straight-forward before they really came into the picture in this way. Michael claims that he wants to return to his old life for the safety of those he cares about, and on some level I believe him, but I think deep down, he's a lot better at the unemotional, disconnected, compartmentalized stuff than he is at having a real life, and he wants that certainty back.

Enter Strickler, stage left. Up till this point, even with the burn notice unraveled, the actual prospect of getting his old job back was still an intangible goal. Along comes Strickler, and all of a sudden, it seems to be a very real possibility. The change in Michael's perspective and priorities was unsettling to his colleagues, and to large extent, the audience as well. Unlike the seeming moral certainty of the previous seasons, Michael's actions while trying to "get back in" were suspect from the first minute he teamed up with Strickler and neither Michael nor anyone else really knew how to resolve that.

As it would turn out, the mid-season finale came to terms with the Strickler situation with two bullets to the chest.

The term "fightin' Irish" just doesn't quite do the finale justice... The episode highlights the veritable "open-season" on Glennannes, but manages to intersect with Strickler in a pretty kick-ass, and fairly surprising manner. As with most of season 3, the finale had me wondering just how (or even if) everything was going work itself out...

In a season where the standard client-of-the-week formula has fallen by the wayside more and more often, it should have come as no surprise that Fi found herself in hot water for the finale. It was quite satisfying to get some backstory on Fi and even more awesome to see her rebellious, IRA badass self find its way to the surface alongside her equally hot-headed brother. And what would a pair of Irish rogues be without an Irish foe gunning for them? Turns out, pretty much all of Ireland wants Fiona dead--a fact which kinda, sorta derails her plans to finally throw in the towel with the Michael situation and go home.

Speaking of which, I was unduly pleased to see Fi finally take a stand with Michael using more than just bravado. She's absolutely correct in saying that if Michael didn't see this coming, he wasn't paying attention. The second he gets a shot at getting back in with the government types, he mortgages his moral compass and aims to leave his friends and family behind. Real nice, Mike. Real nice. I think the writers did a very nice job setting Michael up in such a way that he would consider doing whatever it takes to get what he wants. In essence, Michael has always kind of been the client, and for season 3, it's more salient than ever. Somewhere deep down (or not so deep), Michael has his own best interests at heart. The prospects offered by Strickler put him in a situation where he had to do a lot of things he really didn't want to do, but most importantly, he actually did them. It made the audience wonder just how far he would go... That is, right up to the point where Strickler sold Fi out.

Michael is willing to go pretty far, but not that far. In one of the most surprising, and un-Burn Notice-y turns of events, Michael shoots Strickler twice in the chest. For a show that generally has a very low body count, it came as a pretty awesome shock. The look on his face when Strickler told him to forget the past (read: his gun-smuggling, bomb-making paramour) was classic and the immediate turn around blew me (and Strickler) away. Awesome. Not only was I glad to see Strickler go, but his death illuminates some truths about Michael's relationship with Fi and also sets up the rest of the season in the most uncertain, dangerous, and precarious of possible ways. We all knew Strickler was bad news, but as the mid-season finale came to a close and we got a glimpse of just how bad, I found myself more than a little irked that the show won't be back till January.

It was nice to see Michael reset his priorities in one crucial instant. He always knew his dealings with Strickler were dodgy, but that one major jolt was necessary to make him reevaluate and change tactics. No matter how much he wants his old life back, he can't forget or ignore the past two years and in that moment, I think he realized that the way he does things will never be exactly the way it was. He has a lot more to consider now than just himself and the mission at hand, and while that's been the case for over two years, I don't think he ever really accepted that as a reality till now. His defiant I'm-about-to-shoot-you parting words to Strickler may have been, "Fiona is not a part of my past," but I think that encompasses a whole lot more than just Fi. It'll be interesting to see how his new focus affects his work and relationships in the second half.

As mentioned, the finale ends on less of an edge-of-your-seat cliffhanger than on a deep undercurrent of a cliffhanger that had me wondering what was going to happen in the years to come, not just the minutes to come. No one's life is hanging in the balance, there is no gun to anyone's head, but Michael has just had the rug pulled out from under him and the big bad looming on the horizon is looking to be as bad, if not worse, than all his previous foes. Just when I thought the body count wouldn't get any higher, someone goes and throws Diego out of a window. I honestly wasn't all that fond of him, and don't mind that he's been written out of the show, but what his death means to Michael and the series and important enough to make up for any apathy toward Diego himself. Essentially, Michael's dream of getting his old job back flew right out the window along with Diego. We don't know who Strickler really was, what influence he had, or what his death will mean, but I for one can't wait to find out.

I wasn't too sure where the show would head once the mystery behind the burn notice was revealed, but I'm glad to see the writers have managed to jump Michael out of the pan and into the fire. I appreciate a show that asks and answers its mysteries in due course and can't wait to see what crazy shit they have planned for the future. From what I'm hearing, not only will the baddies get badder and the action get, uh, action-y-er, but Michael's moral compass is still spinning and in a way that makes Sam refuse to help Michael with a mission...

Dun, dun, DUN!

Count. Me. IN.

Monday, August 24, 2009

The Soup Presents: College!

Comedies have kind of been letting me down lately (save for Better Off Ted), so when I saw that the promotional materials for NBC's new comedy Community actually looked promising, it was a very nice, rather funny change of pace. I just saw the full pilot the other day and am pleased to announce that it totally lived up to expectations--yet another nice change of pace for this particular industry...
My standards for half-hour comedies have diminished of late, but that should in no way devalue my appreciation for Community. Even though my disillusionment with The Office and disappointment with Parks and Recreation may have tempered me on the genre as a whole, I think my review of Community manages to be mostly unbiased.

Don't hate me, but The Office has lost a lot of its luster. The last several episodes of last season helped redeem the show to an extent, but there's still a lot of love lost between me and the show. I'm not going to beat a dead horse here, but I think it's pretty much accepted that the show just isn't as funny or fresh as it once was. I think a lot of the problem boils down to perspective and tone. The show kind of took a detour in terms of its goals and that made it fall a little flatter than it should. The banality of working in an office took a backseat to uber-wackiness and that's just not where the soul of the show started out. It's still enjoyable, and the last few episodes of last season were certainly an improvement, but even the most dead-pan and intentionally ordinary of characters have become caricatures. Anyway, long story short, and after the dead horse has been more than a little tenderized, I still enjoy the show, but it's not appointment TV for me anymore. I'm also less than thrilled with the prospect of Jim and Pam getting married and fairly mortified by the prospect of them having a baby. Blah. I've said it before and I'll say it again, babies ruin everything. Words to live by.

In related disappointment news, although I could appreciate that Parks and Recreation was funny, I just couldn't really get into it. I think there are a few fundamental flaws with the premise that make it a difficult series to write for and keep things moving along. I found myself bored with the park storyline after the second episode, but was faced with a season-long arc in that regard. I have heard that the writers are going to make a conscious effort to fix what was wrong and improve the show, so I'm hopeful season two works out better.

Until those shows prove themselves worthy of my approval again, my half-hour comedy yen might just be filled by Community. While not the most spectacularly funny show I've seen, it has a solid premise, a great cast, and a lot of potential for longevity.

With The Soup's Joel McHale at the helm, I was immediately ready to give the show a shot when I saw the first promos. What can I say? The Soup eases the pain after a long, painful week. Nothing soothes a weary soul quite like some chicken tetrazzini. :) Anyway, I've always found McHale to be entertaining and after seeing his brief acting appearances over the years, I was fairly confident he could pull this off. McHale plays a slick lawyer whose law degree isn't valid, landing him at a community college. Accustomed to not actually doing any work, ever, his character's approach to academia (and life, really) is to lie and cheat your way to the top. More words to live by.

School is an astoundingly common backdrop for shows, but with good reason. It's the kind of setting that everyone can relate to in one way or another and offers countless scenarios to be explored. Even with the glut of high school and college shows currently on the air, Community has a particular bent that keeps it from seeming hackneyed or overdone. The cast of characters who come together for a fictitious Spanish study group (Clippos Magnificos!)is entertaining from top to bottom and the dean of the school (community college's have deans, right?) is played by The Daily Show's John Oliver, so add that to the rest of the cast, crew, and set up and there was very little room for me not to enjoy the pilot.

The comedy is solid throughout the pilot and the comedic timing and pacing of the show kept me interested and laughing from start to finish. The comedy ranges from the more overt gags to subtler fare, but the jokes land consistently and while the pilot wasn't uproariously funny every second, it was funny, charming, and snicker-worthy often enough to bolster my confidence for the future of the series. I particularly enjoyed the layers of jokes. Some jokes were set up early on in the pilot and paid off later (Booyah! springs to mind--you'll understand when you see the pilot), others were peppered throughout with a more immediate pay off. It made for a nice blend of the nuanced and the obvious. Another aspect I appreciated was the lack of a soundtrack (which has thankfully become the norm these days). The show didn't make a point of highlighting, underlining, and pointing a big red arrow at jokes, but rather let them go by in a fairly organic way. There were a number that if you weren't paying attention, you'd simply miss them, and that's fine. The episode as a whole wouldn't suffer if you missed something here or there and more than benefitted from the consistent pace and lack of joke spotlight. And really, anytime John Oliver is associated with something, I'm probably going to be a fan. Although I have heard that he's only a guest/recurring star on the show, Joel and the rest of the cast seem plenty capable of carrying off the show on their own.

At the end of the day, it wasn't the most fabulous or funny pilot in the world, but definitely entertaining enough to get me invested in the show. It's not often that a comedy pilot really has me laughing, but Community certainly had its moments. It's got a strong cast and promising premise that I hope is allotted enough episodes that it can really blossom. I only have a handful of half-hour comedies in my current repertoire, so this should make for a nice addition. I have heard this McHale's obligations on Community shouldn't interfere too much with The Soup, so it's really a win-win.

Much like goose grease.

See, I'm still an Office fan at heart... :)